Warner v. Cate et al

Filing 193

ORDER Setting Settlement Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 07/28/2017. Settlement Conference set for 8/18/2017 at 10:15 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone.(Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

EARL WARNER,

13

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01146-MJS (PC)

Plaintiff,

14

v.

15

M. CATE, et al.,

16

ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
Defendants.

17
18

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel and in forma pauperis in this

19

civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court has determined that

20

this case will benefit from a settlement conference. Therefore, this case will be referred

21

to Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone to conduct a settlement conference at the U. S.

22

District Court, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California 93721 in Courtroom #9 on August

23

18, 2017 at 10:15 a.m.

24
25

A separate order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum will issue
concurrently with this order.

26

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

27

1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Stanley

28

A. Boone on August 18, 2017 at 10:15 a.m. at the U. S. District Court, 2500
1

1
2

Tulare Street, Fresno, California 93721 in Courtroom #9.

3

2. A representative with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a
binding settlement on defendant’s behalf shall attend in person.1

4
5

3. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and

6

damages. The failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to

7

this order to appear in person may result in the imposition of sanctions. In

8

addition, the conference will not proceed and will be reset to another date.

9

4. The parties are directed to submit confidential settlement statements to the

10

court using the following email address: [e-mail].

11

Settlement statements shall arrive no later than August 11, 2017. Upon

12

submission of confidential settlement statements, each party shall file on the

13

docket a “Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement Statement.” (See

14

L.R. 270(d)).

15
16

Settlement statements should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor

17

served on any other party. Settlement statements shall be clearly marked

18

“confidential” with the date and time of the settlement conference indicated

19

prominently thereon.

20
21
1

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

While the exercise of its authority is subject to abuse of discretion review, “the district court has the
authority to order parties, including the federal government, to participate in mandatory settlement
conferences… .” United States v. United States District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands, 694 F.3d
1051, 1053, 1057, 1059 (9th Cir. 2012)(“the district court has broad authority to compel participation in
mandatory settlement conference[s].”). The term “full authority to settle” means that the individuals
attending the mediation conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at
that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat
Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989), cited with approval in Official Airline Guides, Inc. v. Goss, 6 F.3d
1385, 1396 (9th Cir. 1993). The individual with full authority to settle must also have “unfettered discretion
and authority” to change the settlement position of the party, if appropriate. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc.,
216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003), amended on recon. in part, Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 2003 WL
23353478 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose behind requiring the attendance of a person with full settlement
authority is that the parties’ view of the case may be altered during the face to face conference. Pitman,
216 F.R.D. at 486. An authorization to settle for a limited dollar amount or sum certain can be found not to
comply with the requirement of full authority to settle. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 596-97
(8th Cir. 2001).

2

1
2

The confidential settlement statement shall be no longer than five pages in

3

length, typed or neatly printed, and include the following:

4
5

a. A brief statement of the facts of the case.

6

b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other

7

grounds upon which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the

8

parties’ likelihood of prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a

9

description of the major issues in dispute.

10

c. A summary of the proceedings to date.

11

d. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery,

12

pretrial, and trial.

13

e. The relief sought.

14

f. The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers

15

and a history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands.
g. A brief statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the settlement

16
17

conference.

18
19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 28, 2017

/s/

21

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3