Warner v. Cate et al
ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM to Transport Plaintiff Earl Warner, CDCR# E-32637, for Settlement Conference on August 18, 2017 at 10:15 a.m., signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 07/28/2017. (Flores, E)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NO.: 1:12-cv-01146-MJS (PC)
M. CATE, et al.,
ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
Earl Warner, CDCR # E-32637, a necessary and material witness in a settlement conference in
this case on August 18, 2017, is confined in the California Institution for Men (CIM), in the
custody of the Warden. In order to secure this inmate's attendance it is necessary that a Writ of
Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue commanding the custodian to produce the inmate before
Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone at the U. S. District Court, Courtroom #9, 2500 Tulare
Street, Fresno, California 93721, on Friday, August 18, 2017 at 10:15 a.m.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court,
commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named above to participate in a
settlement conference at the time and place above, until completion of the settlement
conference or as ordered by the court.
2. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and is
ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM
To: Warden, CIM, P. O. Box 128, Chino, California 91708:
WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to testify before Judge Boone at the
time and place above, until completion of the settlement conference or as ordered by the court.
FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of the inmate
and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
July 28, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?