Blacher v. Johnson et al

Filing 190

ORDER REQUIRING Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Application for a Writ of Attachment of Sequestration Within Twenty-One Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/15/2021. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11

MARLON JESSIE BLACHER,
Plaintiff,

12

v.

13
14

S. JOHNSON,
Defendant.

15

Case No. 1:12-cv-01159-EPG (PC)
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION
FOR A WRIT OF ATTACHMENT OR
SEQUESTRATION WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
DAYS
(ECF NO. 189)

16

Marlon Blacher (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

17
18

in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19

The case settled on March 13, 2018 (ECF No. 150), and the parties filed a stipulation

20

for dismissal of this action with prejudice (ECF No. 151). The case was closed on March 16,

21

2018. (ECF No. 153).
On April 12, 2021, Plaintiff filed an “Application for A Writ of Attachment or

22
23

Sequestration.” (ECF No. 189). To aid the Court’s consideration, the Court will require a

24

response from Defendant.

25

\\\

26

\\\

27

\\\

28

\\\
1

1
2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant has twenty-one days from the date of
service of this order to file a response to Plaintiff’s application.1

3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

April 15, 2021

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1

28

The Court is not requiring a response from Milton Greg Mullanax. Counsel Mullanax was appointed by
the Court as pro bono counsel to represent Plaintiff in this case. But this case has settled and was closed. At this
time, Mr. Mullanax does not represent Plaintiff and does not have an ongoing obligation to represent Plaintiff.
2