Muhammad v. Garrett
Filing
45
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/16/2014. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
KAREEM MUHAMMAD,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
CHAD GARRETT,
15
Defendant.
16
17
) Case Nos.: 1:12-cv-01199 - AWI - JLT
)
) ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS
) TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Kareem Muhammad (“Plaintiff”) has filed three motions to amend his complaint in this action
18
19
since December 19, 2013, which are pending before the Court, the most recent of which was filed on
20
January 13, 2014. (Docs. 37, 40, and 42.) Although it is apparent Plaintiff seeks to change the
21
defendant, each of the proposed Third Amended Complaints are different. (Compare Doc. 38 with
22
Docs. 41 and 43.) Plaintiff is informed he may only have one pleading in this case, and must inform
23
the Court upon which motion he desires to proceed. The other motions to amend will be terminated
24
by the Court. In addition, because Plaintiff no longer seeks to proceed with his claims against Chad
25
Garrett (see Docs. 37, 38, 40, and 43), Plaintiff is directed to show cause why his claims against
26
Officer Garret should not be dismissed with prejudice.
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on or before January 24, 2014, Plaintiff
2
SHALL:
3
1.
Notify the Court regarding which motion to amend he desires to proceed upon; and
4
2.
Show cause why claims against Officer Garrett should not be dismissed with prejudice.
5
Failure to comply with this order may result in an order dismissing this litigation.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 16, 2014
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?