Baldhosky v. Hubbard et al
Filing
60
ORDER Granting 55 Motion to Quash Waiver of Service on Defendant Nguyen, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/5/16. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
RAYMOND BALDHOSKY ,
8
Plaintiff,
9
10
v.
SUSAN HUBBARD, et al.,
11
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01200-LJO-MJS (PC)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO QUASH
WAIVER OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT
NGUYEN
(ECF No. 55)
Defendants.
12
13
14
I.
Procedural History
15
Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action
16
brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 4, 2016, the Court screened Plaintiff’s
17
third amended complaint and found that it stated cognizable claims against ten
18
defendants: Dr. Gonzalez, Dr. Nguyen, Dr. Metts, Physician’s Assistant L. Peters,
19
Physician’s Assistant T. Byers, Nurse T. Grossi, Nurse Ruff, Nurse Indindes, and Nurse
20
Amanda Kaylor. (ECF No. 31.)
21
On May 12, 2016, the United States Marshals Service was ordered to initiate
22
service on the defendants. (ECF No. 33.) Dr. Duc Nguyen waived service on behalf of
23
Defendant Nguyen. (ECF No. 51.)
24
Before the Court is Dr. Nguyen’s pro se motion to quash service on the grounds
25
that he mistakenly waived service and he is not the Defendant Nguyen named in the
26
complaint. (ECF No. 55.) Plaintiff filed no opposition and the time for doing so has
27
passed. Local Rule 230(l).
28
1
1
I.
Legal Standard
2
Service may be effectuated by meeting the state requirements for service or by
3
“delivering a copy of the summons and complaint to the individual personally . . . leaving
4
a copy of each at the individual’s dwelling . . . or delivering a copy of each to an agent
5
authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e).
6
California allows for service to be accomplished by personal delivery or by leaving a
7
copy of the summons and complaint with a qualified individual at the person's home,
8
business, or usual mailing address and subsequently mailing a copy to the person at
9
that address. Cal. Code Civ. Proc. 415.10, 415.20 (2015).
10
Once challenged, a plaintiff bears the burden of establishing that service was
11
proper. Brockmeyer v. May, 383 F.3d 798, 801 (9th Cir. 2004).
12
II.
Discussion
13
Dr. Nguyen states that he has not worked at the California Substance Abuse
14
Treatment Facility since early 2004. Plaintiff does not contest these assertions. The
15
incidents at issue in this action occurred at the California Substance Abuse Treatment
16
Facility in 2009 and 2010. Accordingly, it appears that Dr. Duc Nguyen in not a proper
17
defendant in this action. Plaintiff has not shown that service was properly accomplished
18
upon the correct Defendant Nguyen. The motion to quash service and Dr. Duc Nguyen’s
19
waiver of service will be granted.
20
III.
Conclusion and Order
21
Based on the foregoing, the motion to quash service (ECF No. 55) is HEREBY
22
GRANTED. Further efforts to serve the correct Defendant Nguyen will be discussed at
23
the previously-set December 22, 2016 status conference regarding service.
24
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 5, 2016
/s/
27
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?