Baldhosky v. Hubbard et al

Filing 94

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 76 Motion for Protective Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 05/05/2017. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

RAYMOND BALDHOSKY ,

11
12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.
SUSAN HUBBARD, et al.,

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01200-LJO-MJS (PC)
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR
PROTECTIVE ORDER
(ECF NO. 76)

Defendants.

15
16
17

Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action

18

brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 4, 2016, the Court screened Plaintiff’s

19

third amended complaint and found that it stated cognizable claims against ten

20

defendants: Dr. Gonzalez, Dr. Nguyen, Dr. Metts, Physician’s Assistant L. Peters,

21

Physician’s Assistant T. Byers, Nurse T. Grossi, Nurse Ruff, Nurse Dunn, Nurse

22

Indindes, and Nurse Amanda Kaylor. (ECF No. 31.)

23

Before the Court is a motion for protective order brought by real party in interest

24

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). (ECF No. 76.) Plaintiff

25

filed a response. (ECF Nos. 88, 89, 93.) CDCR filed a reply. (ECF No. 90.) The matter is

26

submitted. Local Rule 230(l).

27
28
1

1

I.

2
3

Procedural History
The subpoena at issue on this motion arises out of a lengthy and cumbersome

effort to serve the Defendants in this case.

4

Defendants Gonzalez, Metts, and Kaylor waived service early in this litigation.

5

Duc Nguyen was served on behalf of Defendant Nguyen, but service on Mr. Nguyen was

6

quashed. (ECF No. 60.) Summons for Defendants Indindes, Ruff, and Dunn were

7

returned unexecuted. (ECF Nos. 45, 46, 67.) Waivers sent to Defendants Byers, Grossi,

8

and Peters were not immediately returned and, for reasons that are presently unclear,

9

the United States Marshals Service (“USM”) did not attempt personal service on these

10

Defendants. (ECF No. 56.)

11

The Court held two status conferences to attempt to resolve service issues. (ECF

12

Nos. 64, 66.) In the latest of these, on January 12, 2017, counsel for Defendants

13

Gonzalez, Metts, and Kaylor represented the following: Defendants Byers, Grossi, and

14

Peters had received service packets and were expected to seek representation from the

15

Office of the Attorney General; address information for the correct Defendant Nguyen

16

had been given to USM; and CDCR was unwilling to provide information for Defendants

17

Indindes, Ruff, and Dunn absent a court order. (ECF No. 66.) Accordingly, on February

18

6, 2017, the Court granted Plaintiff’s oral motion for subpoena duces tecum and issued a

19

subpoena directing CDCR to provide Plaintiff with certain documents regarding the

20

unserved Defendants to assist with service of process. (ECF No. 71.) Defendants Byers,

21

Grossi, and Peters since have appeared in the action and answered the complaint. (ECF

22

No. 85.)

23

II.

Discussion

24

CDCR seeks to modify the subpoena to require that the information required by

25

the subpoena be provided only to the USM for purposes of effecting service, and that the

26

confidential information not be provided to Plaintiff. Plaintiff agrees, “as long as such

27

modification does not waive any rights of discovery[.]” (ECF No. 93.) As this subpoena

28
2

1

was issued solely to obtain information necessary to serve the Defendants, the Court

2

agrees that the subpoena may be modified. However, if the Defendants are not served

3

or do not waive service within 60 days of the date of this order, the Court will order the

4

information released to Plaintiff so that he may conduct his own inquiries or seek further

5

subpoenas to attempt to locate Defendants for service.

6

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. CDCR’s motion for protective order is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED

7
8

IN PART as set forth herein;

9

2. Within five (5) days of the date of this order, CDCR shall provide the

10

information for Defendants Indindes, Ruff, and Dunn to the USM for

11

service.

12
13
14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 5, 2017

/s/

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3