Bell v. Heberling et al

Filing 104

ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 86 and 93 Motion to Motify Discovery and Scheduling Order NUNC PRO TUNC to May 10, 2015, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 05/14/2015. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HORACE THOMAS, a.k.a Horace Bell, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. S HEBERLING, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 19 20 21 22 23 Case No.: 1:12-cv-01248-AWI-SAB (PC) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO MOFIY DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC TO MAY 10, 2015 [ECF Nos. 86, 93] Plaintiff Horace Bell is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1983. On April 9, 2015, Defendants filed a motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order. Plaintiff filed an opposition on April 17, 2015. The Court’s January 9, 2015, discovery and scheduling order, set a April 9, 2015, deadline to file a motion for summary judgment relating to exhaustion of the administrative remedies. Defendants request an extension to April 16, 2015, to file a motion for summary judgment for 24 failure to exhaust the administrative remedies because of the inability to obtain a necessary declaration 25 to support their motion. Plaintiff opposes Defendants’ request and requests a court order to process 26 his administrative remedies. Plaintiff is advised that his request was previously denied and does not 27 present a basis to deny Defendants’ present request for an extension of time to file a motion for 28 summary judgment relating to exhaustion. (ECF Nos. 60, 72.) 1 In as much as Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust the 1 2 administrative remedies on April 10, 2015, and good cause having been presented to the Court, 3 Defendants’ motion is GRANTED nunc pro tunc to April 10, 2015. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: 7 May 14, 2015 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?