Bell v. Heberling et al
Filing
113
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Second Motion for Emergency Restraining Order and Transfer to Federal Protective Custody 99 , signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/28/15. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
HORACE THOMAS, a.k.a Horace Bell,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
S HEBERLING, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
19
20
21
Case No.: 1:12-cv-01248-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY RESTRAINING
ORDER AND TRANSFER TO FEDERAL
PROTECTIVE CUSTODY
[ECF No. 99]
Plaintiff Horace Bell is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1983.
On May 4, 2015, Plaintiff filed a second motion for an emergency restraining order and
transfer to federal protective custody. (ECF No. 99.)
Plaintiff submits that “this motion is based upon Plaintiff’s initial motion and the records and
22
files in this case, judicial notice is requested of those records and the files. For the reasons fully stated
23
and to meet the ends of justice Plaintiff request the court grant the motion.” (ECF No. 99.)
24
Plaintiff previously filed a motion for emergency restraining order and transfer to federal
25
protective custody on February 9, 2015. (ECF No. 63.) Plaintiff’s motion was denied on February 11,
26
2015, because “the Court lacks jurisdiction to issue an order prohibiting the California Department of
27
Corrections and Rehabilitation from transferring Plaintiff to High Desert State Prison because such an
28
order would not remedy the underlying legal claim, which involves Defendants’ past conduct.” (ECF
1
1
No. 64, Order at 2:5-9.) (citations omitted.) Because Plaintiff’s second motion sets forth the same
2
arguments and legal authority as the prior motion, it must be DENIED for the same reasons set forth in
3
the February 11, 2015, order.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated: May 28, 2015
7
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?