Bell v. Heberling et al

Filing 72

ORDER ADOPTING 60 Findings and Recommendation and DENYING Plaintiff's 58 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/11/2015. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

HORACE BELL,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
S HEBERLING, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

Case No.: 1:12-cv-01248-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
[ECF Nos. 58, 60]

Plaintiff Horace Bell is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1983.

19

On February 5, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which was

20

served on Plaintiff and contained notice to the parties that Objections to the Findings and

21

Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff filed an Objection on February 17,

22

2015, and an Amended Objection on February 19, 2015.

23

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

24

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

25

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed on February 5, 2015, is adopted in full; and

3

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction is DENIED.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated: March 11, 2015

7

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2