Smith v. On Habeas Corpus
Filing
18
ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS And Recommendation Granting Motion To Dismiss With Leave To Amend (Doc. 11 ), signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/26/2013. ( Amended Complaint due by 7/30/2013) (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
1:12-cv-01251 AWI MJS HC
VERNELL SMITH,
12
13
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
Petitioner, RECOMMENDATION GRANTING MOTION
TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
v.
(Doc. 11)
14
15
16
ON HABEAS CORPUS,
Respondent.
17
18
19
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
20
On May 17, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation
21
that the motion to dismiss be granted, and Petitioner be provided thirty (30) days from
22
the dated of the order adopting to file an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus to
23
attempt to plead a cognizable federal claim. This Findings and Recommendation was
24
served on all parties with notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30)
25
days of the date of service of the order. Petitioner did not file objections; instead he filed
26
a first amended petition on June 14, 2013.
27
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has
28
conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
1
1
Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is
2
supported by the record and proper analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1.
The Findings and Recommendation issued May 17, 2013, is ADOPTED;
5
2.
The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; and
6
3.
The matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further action in light of
7
this order.
8
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 26, 2013
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC _Signature- END:
12
13
0m8i788
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?