Hawker et al v. BancInsurance, Inc. et al
Filing
56
AMENDMENT TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER -Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/24/2013. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Patrick J. Richard (CA 131046)
prichard@nossaman.com
James H. Vorhis (CA 245034)
jvorhis@nossaman.com
Nossaman LLP
50 California Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415.398.3600
Facsimile: 415.398.2438
Joan M. Cotkin (CA 70665)
jcotkin@nossaman.com
8 Nossaman LLP
777 S. Figueroa St., 34th Floor
9 Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: 213.612.7800
10
Facsimile: 213.612.7801
11
Attorneys for the Federal Deposit
12 Insurance Corporation as Receiver for
County Bank, Plaintiff as assignee of
13 certain claims
7
Jonathan D. Joseph, (CA 90564)
Jonathan M. Cohen, (CA 168207)
jcohen@josephandcohen.com
Joseph and Cohen, APC
1855 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94103
Telephone: 415.817.9200
Facsimile: 415.874.1997
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Thomas T. Hawker, John J. Incandela, Dave
Kraechan, Edwin Jay Lee, and Edward J.
Rocha
15
Edward F. Donohue (SBN 112730)
edonohue@hinshawlaw.com
Christopher J. Borders (SBN 135901)
cborders@hinshawlaw.com
John T. Meno (SBN 231238)
jmeno@hinshawlaw.com
HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP
One California Street, 18th Floor San
Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415-362-6000
Facsimile: 415-834-9070
16
Attorneys for Defendant BANCINSURE, INC.
14
17
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
THOMAS T. HAWKER; JOHN J.
21 INCANDELA; DAVE KRAECHAN;
EDWIN JAY LEE; and EDWARD J.
22
ROCHA,
23
24
Plaintiffs,
v.
25
BANCINSURE, INC. and DOES 1
26 through 10,
27
28
Defendants.
Case No: 1:12-cv-01261-SAB
AMENDMENT TO STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
Pursuant to Paragraph 5m of the Protective Order, Confidential
2
Material may be disclosed to . . . “any other Person as to whom the parties
3
agree in writing.” Protective Order at ¶ 5m (Docket No. 39). The use of
4
5
6
7
8
Confidential Material produced or exchanged in this action, however, is
limited to this action. See Protective Order at ¶ 4. The Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation in its capacity as receiver for other banks (“FDIC”)
and BancInsure are currently involved in other litigations, and anticipate
additional litigation in the future, relating to insurance coverage for claims
9
against the directors or officers of other failed financial institutions (“Similar
10
Suits”). The FDIC and BancInsure seek to share Confidential Material from
11
this action with the counsel of record in the Similar Suits and their staff
12
(“Counsel of Record”), the FDIC’s in-house counsel and their staff (“FDIC
13
Counsel”), BancInsure’s in-house counsel and their staff (“BancInsure
14
Counsel”), and consultants and experts necessarily involved in the conduct
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
of the Similar Suits, to enable these persons to use Confidential Material
subject to the terms of any protective order, the rules of civil procedure, and
the rules of evidence applicable to the Similar Suits. In the event of any
conflict between protective orders, the use of any Confidential Material
used in a Similar Suit shall be governed by the protective order in the
Similar Suit.
Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, the
Court hereby amends the Protective Order, entered in this action on
September 28, 2012, as follows:
1.
The parties may share Confidential Material with the Counsel of
Record, FDIC Counsel, BancInsure Counsel, and/or consultants and
experts necessarily involved in the conduct of a Similar Suit, and enable
28
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
these persons to use Confidential Material, including any court filings filed
under seal, in the Similar Suit subject to the terms of any protective order,
the rules of civil procedure and the rules of evidence applicable to the
Similar Suit.
2.
A representative of the Counsel of Record for the FDIC and
BancInsure necessarily involved in the conduct of the Similar Suit must sign
the acknowledgement in the form of Exhibit A to the Protective Order
(Docket No. 39) before Confidential Material may be shared with 1)
Counsel of Record, and 2) FDIC Counsel, or BancInsure Counsel. The
signature of the Counsel of Record on Exhibit A shall be sufficient to bind 1)
their staff, and 2) the FDIC Counsel and their staff, or BancInsure Counsel
and their staff, to the terms of Exhibit A. The use of Confidential Material in
any Similar Suit is subject to the terms of any protective order in place in
the Similar Suit, the rules of civil procedure and the rules of evidence
governing that Similar Suit. In addition, pursuant to the terms of any
protective order in place in the Similar Suit, Confidential Material may be
shared with the court, court reporters, stenographic reporters, court
personnel, jurors, experts, consultants, witnesses and deponents, potential
witnesses and deponents, mediators, arbitrators, and other parties
providing support services necessary to the litigation of the Similar Suit.
3.
Nothing in this paragraph shall relieve the FDIC or BancInsure
of any obligations to comply with any federal or state laws or statutes.
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
1
DATED: September 23, 2013
NOSSAMAN LLP
2
3
By: /s/ James H. Vorhis
James H. Vorhis
Attorneys for Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, as
Receiver for County Bank, as
assignee of certain claims
4
5
6
7
DATED: September 23, 2013
JOSEPH AND COHEN
8
9
By: /s/ Jonathan A. Cohen
Jonathan A. Cohen
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Thomas
T. Hawker, John J. Incandela,
Dave Kraechan, Edwin Jay Lee
and Edward J. Rocha
10
11
12
13
14
DATED: September 23, 2013
HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP
15
By: /s/ Edward F. Donahue
Edward F. Donahue
Attorneys for Defendant
BancInsure, Inc.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated:
September 24, 2013
_
DEAC _Signature- END:
25
26
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
cm411
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?