Hawker et al v. BancInsurance, Inc. et al

Filing 56

AMENDMENT TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER -Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/24/2013. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Patrick J. Richard (CA 131046) prichard@nossaman.com James H. Vorhis (CA 245034) jvorhis@nossaman.com Nossaman LLP 50 California Street, 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415.398.3600 Facsimile: 415.398.2438 Joan M. Cotkin (CA 70665) jcotkin@nossaman.com 8 Nossaman LLP 777 S. Figueroa St., 34th Floor 9 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: 213.612.7800 10 Facsimile: 213.612.7801 11 Attorneys for the Federal Deposit 12 Insurance Corporation as Receiver for County Bank, Plaintiff as assignee of 13 certain claims 7 Jonathan D. Joseph, (CA 90564) Jonathan M. Cohen, (CA 168207) jcohen@josephandcohen.com Joseph and Cohen, APC 1855 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94103 Telephone: 415.817.9200 Facsimile: 415.874.1997 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Thomas T. Hawker, John J. Incandela, Dave Kraechan, Edwin Jay Lee, and Edward J. Rocha 15 Edward F. Donohue (SBN 112730) edonohue@hinshawlaw.com Christopher J. Borders (SBN 135901) cborders@hinshawlaw.com John T. Meno (SBN 231238) jmeno@hinshawlaw.com HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP One California Street, 18th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-362-6000 Facsimile: 415-834-9070 16 Attorneys for Defendant BANCINSURE, INC. 14 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 THOMAS T. HAWKER; JOHN J. 21 INCANDELA; DAVE KRAECHAN; EDWIN JAY LEE; and EDWARD J. 22 ROCHA, 23 24 Plaintiffs, v. 25 BANCINSURE, INC. and DOES 1 26 through 10, 27 28 Defendants. Case No: 1:12-cv-01261-SAB AMENDMENT TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 Pursuant to Paragraph 5m of the Protective Order, Confidential 2 Material may be disclosed to . . . “any other Person as to whom the parties 3 agree in writing.” Protective Order at ¶ 5m (Docket No. 39). The use of 4 5 6 7 8 Confidential Material produced or exchanged in this action, however, is limited to this action. See Protective Order at ¶ 4. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in its capacity as receiver for other banks (“FDIC”) and BancInsure are currently involved in other litigations, and anticipate additional litigation in the future, relating to insurance coverage for claims 9 against the directors or officers of other failed financial institutions (“Similar 10 Suits”). The FDIC and BancInsure seek to share Confidential Material from 11 this action with the counsel of record in the Similar Suits and their staff 12 (“Counsel of Record”), the FDIC’s in-house counsel and their staff (“FDIC 13 Counsel”), BancInsure’s in-house counsel and their staff (“BancInsure 14 Counsel”), and consultants and experts necessarily involved in the conduct 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 of the Similar Suits, to enable these persons to use Confidential Material subject to the terms of any protective order, the rules of civil procedure, and the rules of evidence applicable to the Similar Suits. In the event of any conflict between protective orders, the use of any Confidential Material used in a Similar Suit shall be governed by the protective order in the Similar Suit. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby amends the Protective Order, entered in this action on September 28, 2012, as follows: 1. The parties may share Confidential Material with the Counsel of Record, FDIC Counsel, BancInsure Counsel, and/or consultants and experts necessarily involved in the conduct of a Similar Suit, and enable 28 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 these persons to use Confidential Material, including any court filings filed under seal, in the Similar Suit subject to the terms of any protective order, the rules of civil procedure and the rules of evidence applicable to the Similar Suit. 2. A representative of the Counsel of Record for the FDIC and BancInsure necessarily involved in the conduct of the Similar Suit must sign the acknowledgement in the form of Exhibit A to the Protective Order (Docket No. 39) before Confidential Material may be shared with 1) Counsel of Record, and 2) FDIC Counsel, or BancInsure Counsel. The signature of the Counsel of Record on Exhibit A shall be sufficient to bind 1) their staff, and 2) the FDIC Counsel and their staff, or BancInsure Counsel and their staff, to the terms of Exhibit A. The use of Confidential Material in any Similar Suit is subject to the terms of any protective order in place in the Similar Suit, the rules of civil procedure and the rules of evidence governing that Similar Suit. In addition, pursuant to the terms of any protective order in place in the Similar Suit, Confidential Material may be shared with the court, court reporters, stenographic reporters, court personnel, jurors, experts, consultants, witnesses and deponents, potential witnesses and deponents, mediators, arbitrators, and other parties providing support services necessary to the litigation of the Similar Suit. 3. Nothing in this paragraph shall relieve the FDIC or BancInsure of any obligations to comply with any federal or state laws or statutes. 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 1 DATED: September 23, 2013 NOSSAMAN LLP 2 3 By: /s/ James H. Vorhis James H. Vorhis Attorneys for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for County Bank, as assignee of certain claims 4 5 6 7 DATED: September 23, 2013 JOSEPH AND COHEN 8 9 By: /s/ Jonathan A. Cohen Jonathan A. Cohen Attorneys for Plaintiffs Thomas T. Hawker, John J. Incandela, Dave Kraechan, Edwin Jay Lee and Edward J. Rocha 10 11 12 13 14 DATED: September 23, 2013 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP 15 By: /s/ Edward F. Donahue Edward F. Donahue Attorneys for Defendant BancInsure, Inc. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: September 24, 2013 _ DEAC _Signature- END: 25 26 _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE cm411 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?