United States for the use of Hajoca Corporation v. Aeroplate Corporation, et al.
Filing
33
ORDER to File Supplemental Briefing: to Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, no later than 5/28/2013. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/13/2013. (Herman, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
UNTIED STATES for the use of HAJOCA )
CORPORATION,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
1: 12-cv-1287-AWI-BAM
ORDER TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING
12
vs.
13
14
15
16
17
)
)
)
AEROPLATE CORPORATION, MARY )
WILLIAMS and RONALD D.
)
PATTERSON
)
)
)
Defendant.
)
___________________________________ )
18
19
On March 15, 2013, Plaintiff United States for the use of Hajoca Corporation (“Plaintiff”) filed
20
a motion for default judgment against Aeroplate Corporation, Mary Williams, and Ronald D. Patterson
21
(“Defendants”) (Doc. 28). Having considered Plaintiff’s motion for default judgement (Docs. 28, 31)
22
and accompanying submissions, the Court hereby orders that supplemental briefing and evidence be
23
provided as follows.
24
25
26
27
28
The Court determines that in its supplemental briefing, Plaintiff must address the following
deficiencies:
1.
Plaintiff did not include a memorandum of points and authorities explaining its
entitlement to default judgment pursuant to the factors enumerated in the Ninth Circuit’s
1
decision in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir. 1986);
1
2
2.
3
4
Plaintiff did not brief the issue of this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to the
Miller Act and whether and why the Miller Act applies to Plaintiff’s claims;
3.
Plaintiff did not brief how it arrived at its final calculations or whether Plaintiff is entitled
5
to prejudgment interest. Further, the Court notes, Plaintiff’s first motion for default
6
judgment alleges Defendants owe $66,991.26 (Doc. 29), but in further submissions
7
Plaintiff argues that a total of $72,710.14 is owed. (Doc. 31). Plaintiff is instructed to
8
clarify its request;
9
4.
Plaintiff must also include a copy of the written contract/credit agreement designated as
10
Exhibit 1 in the Declaration of Joy Banks. (See Doc. 29-1). While Plaintiff frequently
11
references the Agreement, no documents are included in the Docket Entry labeled
12
Exhibit 1. See Id.
13
Accordingly, Plaintiff is directed to submit to the Court any and all evidence establishing that
14
Plaintiff is entitled to default judgment as listed above. Plaintiff shall file such evidence and
15
accompanying briefing no later than May 28, 2013.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
10c20k
May 13, 2013
/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?