Miller v. Najera, et. al.

Filing 11

ORDER DENYING as MOOT Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/29/2013. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

STEVEN R. MILLER,

CASE No. 1:12-cv-01288-AWI-MJS (PC)

10
Plaintiff,

11
v.

12
13

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS

ALBERT NAJERA, et al.,

14

(ECF No. 2)

Defendants.
/

15
16
17

Plaintiff Steven R. Miller, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se filed this civil rights

18
19

action on July 30, 2012 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown

20

Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). (ECF No. 1.) On

21

July 30, 2012, he filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2), which is now

22

before the Court.

23

///

24
///
25
26

///

27
-1-

1
2

On August 13, 2012, Plaintiff paid the filing fee. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to
proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot.

3
4
5
6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
il0i0d

March 29, 2013

/s/

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
-2-