Miller v. Najera, et. al.

Filing 77

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 76 Request for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/22/2017. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

STEVEN R. MILLER,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT

Plaintiff,

6
v.

7
8

1:12-cv-01288-LJO

ALBERT NAJERA, et al.,
Defendants.

9

(ECF No. 76)

10
11
Pro se Plaintiff Steven Miller brings this case alleging failure to protect and deliberate
12
indifference under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. On September 5, 2017, Defendants filed a
13
motion for summary judgment. Doc. 70. On September 20, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for stay and/or
14
request for extension of time to respond to the motions for summary judgment. Doc. 76. In light of the
15

representations in Plaintiff’s motion and the complexity of the pending motions, the Court finds good

16
cause to GRANT Plaintiff an extension. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall file his opposition to the motion for
17
summary judgment on or before November 2, 2017. Defendants may file any replies on or before
18
November 17, 2017.
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
Dated:
22

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

September 22, 2017

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

23
24
25
1