Miller v. Najera, et. al.

Filing 77

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 76 Request for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/22/2017. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 STEVEN R. MILLER, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff, 6 v. 7 8 1:12-cv-01288-LJO ALBERT NAJERA, et al., Defendants. 9 (ECF No. 76) 10 11 Pro se Plaintiff Steven Miller brings this case alleging failure to protect and deliberate 12 indifference under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. On September 5, 2017, Defendants filed a 13 motion for summary judgment. Doc. 70. On September 20, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for stay and/or 14 request for extension of time to respond to the motions for summary judgment. Doc. 76. In light of the 15 representations in Plaintiff’s motion and the complexity of the pending motions, the Court finds good 16 cause to GRANT Plaintiff an extension. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall file his opposition to the motion for 17 summary judgment on or before November 2, 2017. Defendants may file any replies on or before 18 November 17, 2017. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: 22 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ September 22, 2017 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?