Martinez v. Lawless et al

Filing 37

ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition within Twenty-One Days signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/15/2015. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 VICTOR HUGO MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, 11 12 v. 13 ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION WITHIN TWENTY-ONE DAYS C. LAWLESS, et al., 14 Case No. 1:12-cv-01301-LJO-SKO (PC) Defendants. _____________________________________/ (Doc. 34) 15 16 Plaintiff Victor Hugo Martinez, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 17 filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on August 9, 2012. This action is 18 proceeding against Defendants Morse, Herrera, Chamberlin, and Molina for violating Plaintiff’s 19 rights under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution. On April 6, 2015, 20 Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. To date, Plaintiff has not 21 filed a response. 22 Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or a 23 statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ motion within twenty-one (21) days. Plaintiff is 24 warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action, with 25 prejudice, for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: June 15, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?