Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al

Filing 43

STIPULATION REQUESTING COURT ORDER ALLOWING THE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on December 3, 2012. (Munoz, I)

Download PDF
1 STEPHAN C. VOLKER (CSB #63093) JOSHUA A. H. HARRIS (CSB #226898) 2 DANIEL GARRETT-STEINMAN (CSB #269146) M. BENJAMIN EICHENBERG (CSB #270893) 3 LAW OFFICES OF STEPHAN C. VOLKER 436 14th Street, Suite 1300 4 Oakland, California 94612 Tel: 510/496-0600 5 Fax: 510/496-1366 10.524.02 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN’S 7 ASSOCIATIONS and SAN FRANCISCO CRAB BOAT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN’S ASSOCIATIONS and SAN FRANCISCO CRAB BOAT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ) INTERIOR, and UNITED STATES ) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, ) ) Defendants, ) ) WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, SAN ) LUIS WATER DISTRICT, and PANOCHE ) WATER DISTRICT, ) ) Defendants-Intervenors. ) ) Civ. No. 1:12-cv-01303 LJO-MJS STIPULATION REQUESTING COURT ORDER ALLOWING THE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS TO DISMISS; ORDER THEREON Magistrate Judge Hon. Michael J. Seng The parties hereby stipulate to the filing to plaintiffs’ proposed First Amended Complaint and to 23 the following schedule for the filing and briefing of defendants’ motions to dismiss and based thereon, 24 respectfully request this Court’s Order approving this Stipulation: 25 1. Defendants and defendant-intervenors do not oppose the filing of the First Amended 26 Complaint as proposed by plaintiffs in their motion to amend, filed October 26, 2012. Accordingly, the 27 Court may order that the First Amended Complaint be filed. 28 2. The First Amended Complaint moots defendants’ and defendant-intervenors’ motions to STIPULATION REQUESTING COURT ORDER ALLOWING FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS TO DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON Case No. 1:12-cv-01303-LJO-MJS 1 dismiss the original Complaint. Those motions were filed on September 12, 2012, and October 4, 2 2012, respectively. The Court vacated the hearing on those motions on October 29, 2012. 3 3. Defendants shall file their motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint on or 4 before December 19, 2012. 5 4. Plaintiffs shall file their oppositions to defendants’ motions to dismiss on or before January 6 10, 2013. 7 5. Defendants shall file their optional replies, if any, to plaintiffs’ opposition on or before 8 January 24, 2013. 9 10 6. The Court shall hear defendants’ motions to dismiss on or after January 31, 2013. IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED. 11 Dated: November 30, 2012 LAW OFFICES OF STEPHAN C. VOLKER 12 13 s/ Stephan C. Volker STEPHAN C. VOLKER Attorney for Plaintiffs 14 Dated: November 30, 2012 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 15 16 s/ Joseph H. Kim (by S. Volker with permission) JOSEPH H. KIM Attorney for Federal Defendants 17 Dated: November 30, 2012 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP 18 s/ Cynthia J. Larsen (by S. Volker with permission) CYNTHIA J. LARSEN Attorney for Defendants-Intervenors by S. Volker with permission 19 20 21 22 ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation, this Court adopts the proposed filing and briefing 23 schedule and will consider the motions on the record without a hearing, unless this Court orders 24 otherwise. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: 66h44d December 3, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 STIPULATION REQUESTING COURT ORDER ALLOWING FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS TO DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON -2- Case No. 1:12-cv-01303-LJO-MJS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?