Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
Filing
43
STIPULATION REQUESTING COURT ORDER ALLOWING THE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on December 3, 2012. (Munoz, I)
1 STEPHAN C. VOLKER (CSB #63093)
JOSHUA A. H. HARRIS (CSB #226898)
2 DANIEL GARRETT-STEINMAN (CSB #269146)
M. BENJAMIN EICHENBERG (CSB #270893)
3 LAW OFFICES OF STEPHAN C. VOLKER
436 14th Street, Suite 1300
4 Oakland, California 94612
Tel: 510/496-0600
5 Fax: 510/496-1366
10.524.02
6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN’S
7 ASSOCIATIONS and SAN FRANCISCO CRAB BOAT
OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF
FISHERMEN’S ASSOCIATIONS and SAN
FRANCISCO CRAB BOAT OWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC.,
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE )
INTERIOR, and UNITED STATES
)
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION,
)
)
Defendants,
)
)
WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, SAN
)
LUIS WATER DISTRICT, and PANOCHE
)
WATER DISTRICT,
)
)
Defendants-Intervenors. )
)
Civ. No. 1:12-cv-01303 LJO-MJS
STIPULATION REQUESTING COURT
ORDER ALLOWING THE FILING OF
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
MOTIONS TO DISMISS; ORDER THEREON
Magistrate Judge Hon. Michael J. Seng
The parties hereby stipulate to the filing to plaintiffs’ proposed First Amended Complaint and to
23 the following schedule for the filing and briefing of defendants’ motions to dismiss and based thereon,
24 respectfully request this Court’s Order approving this Stipulation:
25
1.
Defendants and defendant-intervenors do not oppose the filing of the First Amended
26 Complaint as proposed by plaintiffs in their motion to amend, filed October 26, 2012. Accordingly, the
27 Court may order that the First Amended Complaint be filed.
28
2.
The First Amended Complaint moots defendants’ and defendant-intervenors’ motions to
STIPULATION REQUESTING COURT ORDER ALLOWING
FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING
A BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS TO DISMISS;
[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
Case No. 1:12-cv-01303-LJO-MJS
1 dismiss the original Complaint. Those motions were filed on September 12, 2012, and October 4,
2 2012, respectively. The Court vacated the hearing on those motions on October 29, 2012.
3
3.
Defendants shall file their motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint on or
4 before December 19, 2012.
5
4.
Plaintiffs shall file their oppositions to defendants’ motions to dismiss on or before January
6 10, 2013.
7
5.
Defendants shall file their optional replies, if any, to plaintiffs’ opposition on or before
8 January 24, 2013.
9
10
6.
The Court shall hear defendants’ motions to dismiss on or after January 31, 2013.
IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED.
11 Dated: November 30, 2012
LAW OFFICES OF STEPHAN C. VOLKER
12
13
s/ Stephan C. Volker
STEPHAN C. VOLKER
Attorney for Plaintiffs
14 Dated: November 30, 2012
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
15
16
s/ Joseph H. Kim (by S. Volker with permission)
JOSEPH H. KIM
Attorney for Federal Defendants
17 Dated: November 30, 2012
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP
18
s/ Cynthia J. Larsen (by S. Volker with permission)
CYNTHIA J. LARSEN
Attorney for Defendants-Intervenors
by S. Volker with permission
19
20
21
22
ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation, this Court adopts the proposed filing and briefing
23 schedule and will consider the motions on the record without a hearing, unless this Court orders
24 otherwise.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated:
66h44d
December 3, 2012
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
STIPULATION REQUESTING COURT ORDER ALLOWING
FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING
A BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS TO DISMISS;
[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
-2-
Case No. 1:12-cv-01303-LJO-MJS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?