Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al

Filing 71

ORDER GRANTING FEDERAL DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A STAY IN LIGHT OF LAPSE OF APPROPRIATIONS 70 signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on October 3, 2013. (Munoz, I)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN’S ASSOCIATIONS and SAN FRANCISCO CRAB BOAT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ORDER GRANTING FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A STAY IN LIGHT OF LAPSE OF APPROPRIATIONS (Doc.70) Plaintiffs, 9 10 CASE NO. 1:12-CV-01303-LJO-MJS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE 11 INTERIOR and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, 12 Defendants, 13 and 14 WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, SAN LUIS 15 WATER DISTRICT, and PANOCHE WATER DISTRICT, 16 Intervenor-Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The United States of America has moved for a stay of the above-captioned case in light of the federal government shutdown. Absent an appropriation, Department of Justice attorneys and employees of the federal defendants are prohibited from working, even on a voluntary basis, except in very limited circumstances, including “emergencies involving the safety of human life or the protection of property.” 31 U.S.C. § 1342. Counsel for the United States has represented that Plaintiffs and Defendant Intervenors do not oppose a stay under the circumstances. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) This action is STAYED until funding for Federal Defendants and their attorneys is restored; 1 1 (2) All pending deadlines, including the deadlines related to the scheduled cross motions 2 for summary judgment, are EXTENDED for the exact number of days appropriations are 3 unavailable. 4 5 6 SO ORDERED Dated: October 3, 2013 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?