Beco Dairy Automation, Inc. v. Global Tech Systems, Inc.

Filing 26

ORDER GRANTING the parties' request that the number of interrogatories per designated discovery area be increased and that the supplemental designation of expert witnesses deadline currently set for 10/18/2013 be advanced to 8/16/2013. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 3/12/2013. (Rooney, M)

1
2
3
4

Michael A. Dias, SBN 183705
Alicia D. Wrest, SBN 272074
DIAS LAW FIRM, INC.
502 West Grangeville Boulevard
Hanford, California 93230
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

ATTORNEYS FOR BECO DAIRY AUTOMATION, INC.
Peter F. Lindborg, Esq. SBN 150192
Irina J. Mazor, Esq. SBN 185144
Patricia I. Forman, Esq. SBN 245108
LINBORG & MAZOR, LLP
550 North Brand Boulevard, Suite 1830
Glendale, California 91203
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
GLOBAL TECH SYSTEMS, INC.

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17
18

BECO DAIRY AUTOMATION, INC.,
Plaintiff(s),

19
20
21
22

v.
GLOBAL TECH SYSTEMS, INC., and
DOES 1 to 50,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 1:12-CV-1310-LJO-S-MS
Hon. Sandra M. Snyder
ORDER FOR FILING STIPULATION TO
AMEND THE CURRENT SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE ORDER

23

Upon consideration of the Stipulation to Amend the Current Scheduling
24
25

Conference Order submitted by the parties, the Court orders the following:
Dias Law Firm, Inc.

26

Michael A. Dias
Jonette M. Montgomery
John C. Umscheid
Ella R. Floresca
Alicia D. Wrest
Jimmy J. Rodriguez

27
28
ORDER FOR FILING OF STIPULATION TO AMEND THE CURRENT SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE ORDER

1

ORDER

1
2

IT IS ORDERED that there be an increase in the number of form interrogatories

3

to 50 interrogatories per designated discovery area as follows:

4

related to the Contracted Products agreement; 2.) Interrogatories related to the Cow ID

5

technology agreement; 3.)Interrogatories related to Plaintiff’s claims of fraud as alleged

6

in the First Amended Complaint; 4.) Interrogatories related to Plaintiff’s claims of

7

interference as alleged in the First Amended Complaint; 5.) Interrogatories related to

8

Defendant’s claims of interference as alleged in Defendant’s Counterclaim; 6.)

9

Interrogatories related to Plaintiff’s alleged dealings in the Ukraine as alleged in the

10

Counterclaim; and 7.) Interrogatories related to Defendant’s patents as set forth in the

11

Counterclaim.

12

interrogatories were propounded. As to all other forms of discovery, the parties do not

13

currently anticipate the need for any change from the statutorily imposed limits and

14

procedures.

15
16

1.) Interrogatories

All responses to interrogatories will be due 33 days after the

It IS FURTHER ORDERED that August 16, 2013, is the deadline for initial
Expert Witness Disclosures, which is 60 days prior to the proposed discovery cutoff.

17
18
19
20
21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25

Dated:

March 12, 2013

/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEAC _Signature- END:

icido34h
Dias Law Firm, Inc.

26

Michael A. Dias
Jonette M. Montgomery
John C. Umscheid
Ella R. Floresca
Alicia D. Wrest
Jimmy J. Rodriguez

27
28
ORDER FOR FILING OF STIPULATION TO AMEND THE CURRENT SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE ORDER

2