Kinnamon v. Latia et al

Filing 44

ORDER Extending Application of Discovery and Scheduling Order to Defendant Jordan, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 6/27/14. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 TODD KINNAMON, 13 Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 C. LATIA, et al., 16 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:12cv01325 AWI DLB PC ORDER EXTENDING APPLICATION OF DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER TO DEFENDANT JORDAN (Document 27) 17 Plaintiff Todd Kinnamon, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed 18 19 this civil rights action on August 15, 2012. 20 21 22 Defendant Latia filed an answer on February 24, 2014. As a result, the Court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order on February 27, 2014. At the time, Defendant Jordan had not yet appeared. 23 24 Subsequently, on April 7, 2014, Defendant Jordan filed an answer. The Court denied Defendant Latia’s motion for reconsideration of the initial disclosure requirement on May 29, 25 2014. 26 27 28 1 1 2 Accordingly, application of the Discovery and Scheduling Order filed on February 24, 2014, is HEREBY EXTENDED to Defendant Jordan.1 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 June 27, 2014 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Defendant Jordan and Defendant Latia filed a statement regarding compliance with the initial disclosure requirement on June 26, 2014. It therefore appears that Defendant Jordan is already acting pursuant to the Discovery and Scheduling Order, though the Court issues this order to avoid any confusion. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?