Cato v. Director of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 33

ORDER Denying Motion For Court Order (ECF No. 29 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/3/2014. (Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

JAMES CATO, JR.,
Plaintiff,

13
14

Case No. 1:12-cv-1331-LJO-MJS (PC)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
COURT ORDER

v.

15

DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,

16

(ECF No. 29)

Defendants.

17
18
19
20

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

21 rights action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 9 & 14.) The action
22 proceeds against Defendants Brambaugh and Nash on Plaintiff’s First Amendment
23 claim. (ECF Nos. 15 & 17.)
24

On September 25, 2014, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF

25 No. 26.) On October 22, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion (ECF No. 29), seeking an order
26 requiring officials at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility to facilitate the
27 copying of Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion. Plaintiff states that the senior law
28

1 librarian refused to copy the motion based upon the contents of the attached exhibits.
2

Plaintiff since has filed his opposition to Defendants’ motion and the attached

3 exhibits. (ECF No. 32.) Accordingly, his motion for court order (ECF No. 29) is HEREBY
4 DENIED as moot.
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

December 3, 2014

/s/

8

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2