Reno Rios v. Gipson et al

Filing 120

ORDER GRANTING Leave to File a Supplemental Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and for Reply signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/1/2018. 30-day deadline. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 1:12-cv-01334-LJO-SKO (PC) RENO RIOS, v. GIPSON, et al, 13 Defendants. ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND FOR REPLY (Doc. 119) 14 15 Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment on the merits of Plaintiff’s claims 16 17 in this action which is presently pending before the Court. (Doc. 88.) Plaintiff filed an 18 opposition (Docs. 111-115) and Defendants filed a motion seeking a 60-day extension of time to 19 20 21 22 file their reply (Doc. 116). Rather than granting Defendants the requested extension of time, they were ordered to file a supplement to their motion, which has been filed and served on Plaintiff. (Docs. 117, 119.) Plaintiff may supplement his opposition to address the additional evidence Defendants submitted. It has been several months since Plaintiff received information on the requirements to 23 24 25 26 oppose a motion for summary judgment. Thus, he is provided them again herewith. Defendants’ motion has been pending for an excessive amount of time and both parties are granted deadlines exceeding those stated in the Local Rules, see L.R. 230(l). Hence no further extensions of time will be granted. 27 /// 28 1 1 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order, Plaintiff SHALL file 3 either a supplement to his opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary 4 judgment, or a statement that he stands on his previously submitted opposition; 2. 5 if Defendants desire to file a reply, they SHALL do so within fourteen (14) days of the date Plaintiff’s supplemental opposition or statement is filed; and 6 3. 7 the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve Plaintiff with a copy of the Second Informational Order, that issued on February 5, 2018, (Doc. 91). 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 Dated: October 1, 2018 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?