Reno Rios v. Gipson et al
Filing
85
ORDER Extending the Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 09/26/2017. Dispositive Motions filed by 12/1/2017. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
RENO RIOS,
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
13
Case No. 1:12-cv-01334-LJO-SKO (PC)
ORDER EXTENDING THE DISPOSITIVE
MOTION FILING DEADLINE
GIPSON, et al.,
Defendants.
14
DEADLINE: December 1, 2017
15
16
17
Plaintiff, Reno Rios, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this
18
civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s claims in
19
the First Amended Complaint for inadequate medical treatment of his chronic conditions such as
20
asthma and nerve pain.1 After multiple requests for extensions of time, Defendants’ motion for
21
summary judgment for failure to exhaust available administrative remedies under the Prison
22
Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, was recently resolved. (See Docs. 65, 81, 83.)
23
The June 30, 2017 deadline for filing of dispositive motions lapsed during the time that
24
Defendant’s motion on exhaustion issues was pending and needs to be reset. (See Doc. 69.)
25
26
27
28
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for filing dispositive motions is
extended to December 1, 2017. All other requirements of the Discovery and Scheduling Order
1
See Doc. 12, Amend. Compl., ¶¶19-22, 25, 26, 29, 30-32, 48-64; Doc. 21, 9th Cir. Memo; Doc. 23, 9th Cir.
Mandate; see also Doc. 83, granting summary judgment and dismissing Plaintiff’s dental claims without prejudice.
1
1
which issued on February 18, 2016, (Doc. 43), shall remain in effect.
2
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 26, 2017
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?