Morales v. Chung et al
Filing
11
ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/23/2012. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: Tanya@moorelawfirm.com
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
John Morales
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
20
) No. 1:12-CV-01335-AWI-GSA
)
Plaintiff,
) NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
) OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
)
vs.
)
YOUNG BAE CHUNG and SANDY OK
)
CHUNG, TRUSTEES OF THE YOUNG BAE )
)
CHUNG AND SANDY OK CHUNG
)
REVOCABLE TRUST DATED 9/21/2006; )
SAK KAUFMAN dba PHO #76
)
)
RESTAURANT & BAKERY aka PHO 76
)
RESTAURANT & BAKERY,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
21
WHEREAS, no Defendant has filed an answer or motion for summary judgment;
22
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants have settled the matter in its entirety amongst
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
23
JOHN MORALES,
themselves;
24
WHEREAS, no counterclaim has been filed;
25
Plaintiff hereby respectfully requests that this action be dismissed with prejudice
26
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i).
27
///
28
///
Morales v. Young Bae Chung, et al.
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Action; [Proposed] Order
Page 1
1
Date: October 23, 2012
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
2
3
/s/Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff John Morales
4
5
6
ORDER
7
8
Good cause appearing,
9
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety
10
pursuant to Rule 41(a), and the clerk shall CLOSE this case.
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
Dated:
October 23, 2012
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
DEAC_Signature-END:
18
ciem0h3i
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Morales v. Young Bae Chung, et al.
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Action; [Proposed] Order
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?