Ransom v. Aguirre et al

Filing 104

ORDER Adopting Findings And Recommendations And Denying Defendants' Motion For Partial Summary Judgment Pending An Evidentiary Hearing (Documents 94 , 103 ), signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/30/2015. (Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10
11

BRYAN E. RANSOM,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

vs.
RODOLFO AGUIRRE, et al.,

15

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:12cv01343 AWI DLB PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND
DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PENDING AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING
(Documents 94, 103)

16

Plaintiff Bryan E. Ransom (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil

17
18

rights action. Defendants paid the filing fee and removed the action to this Court on August 16,

19

2012.

20
21
22
23

On December 30, 2014, Defendants filed a motion for partial summary judgment based
on Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. The matter was referred to a United
States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On August 25, 2015, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations that Defendants’

24
25
26

motion be denied pending an evidentiary hearing. The parties were advised that objections were
to be filed within thirty days of the date of service of this order. No objections have been filed.

27
28
1

1
2
3
4

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted
a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the
Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5

1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 25, 2015, (Doc. 103) are

6

ADOPTED in full;

7
8

2.

exhaust (Document 94) is DENIED PENDING AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING;

9

and

10
11

Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment based on Plaintiff’s failure to

3.

The matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

12
13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 30, 2015
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2