Ransom v. Aguirre et al
Filing
150
ORDER Denying Defendant's 138 Motion to Compel as Moot, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/21/17. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BRYAN E. RANSOM,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
vs.
1:12-cv-01343-DAD-GSA-PC
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO COMPEL AS MOOT
(ECF No. 138.)
AGUIRRE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Bryan E. Ransom (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights
18
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s First Amended
19
Complaint filed on March 6, 2013, against defendants Aguirre, Alanis, Clark, Cortez, Kernan,
20
Mariscal, Messick, Moon, Perez, Singh, Ulit, Vallejo, Vogel, Wang, and Wooden (collectively,
21
“Defendants”), on Plaintiff’s claims for retaliation, adverse conditions of confinement,
22
inadequate medical care, and state tort violations, arising from events occurring in 2011. (ECF
23
No. 12.)
24
On October 10, 2016, Defendants filed a motion to compel Plaintiff to provide initial
25
disclosures to Defendants as required by the court’s discovery and scheduling order issued on
26
August 9, 2016. (ECF No. 138.)
27
disclosures from Plaintiff, and the deadline to provide initial disclosures expired on September
Defendants assert that they have not received any initial
28
1
1
22, 2016. They also assert that Plaintiff has not requested any extension of time to serve his
2
initial disclosures or moved to modify the discovery and scheduling order.
3
On June 19, 2017, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to serve initial
4
disclosures on Defendants within thirty days. (ECF No. 149.) Because a new deadline has
5
been established for Plaintiff to serve initial disclosure, Defendants’ motion to compel is moot
6
and shall be denied as such.
7
8
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to compel, filed on
October 10, 2016, is DENIED as moot.
9
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 21, 2017
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?