Ransom v. Aguirre et al

Filing 72

ORDER REGARDING Defendants' 71 Request for Discovery; ORDER Opening Limited Discovery for Ninety Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 5/29/2014. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 BRYAN E. RANSOM, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. RODOLFO AGUIRRE, et al., 15 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:12cv01343 AWI DLB PC ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY (Document 71) ORDER OPENING LIMITED DISCOVERY FOR NINETY DAYS 16 Plaintiff Bryan E. Ransom (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California 17 18 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this 19 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants removed the action on August 16, 20 21 22 2012. On May 12, 2014, Defendants responded to the Court’s April 10, 2014, order as to whether the parties needed limited discovery in preparation for Defendants’ upcoming motion 23 for summary judgment related to exhaustion. Defendants requested that discovery be limited to 24 25 26 exhaustion and compliance with the California Tort Claims Act. Plaintiff did not respond to the Court’s order. 27 28 1 1 2 3 4 The Court finds good cause to open limited discovery at this time related only to Plaintiff’s exhaustion of his constitutional claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and exhaustion of his state law claims. No discovery on the merits will be permitted at this time. Discovery must be completed by August 29, 2014. Motions to compel must also be filed 5 by that date. 6 7 8 9 Defendants’ motion for summary judgment must be filed by October 30, 2014. The Court will set an evidentiary hearing, if necessary, after briefing on the motion for summary judgment is complete. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 Dated: /s/ Dennis May 29, 2014 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?