Verdeja v. Mazzei et al
Filing
11
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss Action, Without Prejudice, for Failure to Comply With Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/23/2013, referred to Judge Ishii. Objections to F&R Due Within Thirty Days. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
1:12-cv-01350-AWI-GSA-PC
JONATHAN VERDEJA,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TO DISMISS ACTION, WITHOUT
PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY
WITH COURT ORDER
(Doc. 10.)
vs.
C/O MAZZEI, et al.,
14
Defendants.
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN THIRTY
DAYS
15
16
17
Jonathan Verdeja ("Plaintiff"), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis,
18
filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983 on August 20, 2012. (Doc. 1.) On
19
April 15, 2013, the Court entered an order requiring Plaintiff to either file an amended
20
complaint, or notify the Court of his willingness to proceed on the claims found cognizable by
21
the Court, within thirty days. (Doc. 6.) To date, Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise
22
responded to the Court=s order.1
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED,
24
without prejudice, based on Plaintiff=s failure to comply with the Court’s order of April 15,
25
2013.
26
27
28
1
The United States Postal Service returned the order on April 24, 2013 as undeliverable. A notation on
the envelope indicates that Plaintiff was discharged. However, Plaintiff has not notified the court of any change in
his address. Absent such notice, service at a party=s prior address is fully effective. Local Rule 182(f).
1
1
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
2
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(l). Within thirty
3
days after the date of service of these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file written
4
objections with the Court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate
5
Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections
6
within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v.
7
Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
8
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
12
13
14
May 23, 2013
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
6i0kij8d
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?