Nogueras v. Lopez et al

Filing 52

ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Compel 50 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/5/16: Twenty-One (21) Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

EUGENIO LUIS NOGUERAS,
Plaintiff,

7
v.

8
9

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO
FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF
NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S
MOTION TO COMPEL

S. LOPEZ, et al.,
(Doc. 50)
Defendants.

10
11

Case No. 1:12-cv-01365-LJO-SKO (PC)

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
_____________________________________/

12
Plaintiff Eugenio Luis Nogueras, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

13
14
15
16
17

pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on August 21, 2012. The only
remaining defendant in this action, Larry Dileo, filed a motion to compel Plaintiff to respond to
his discovery requests. (Doc. 50.) Plaintiff has filed neither an opposition, nor a statement of nonopposition to the motion despite lapse of the requisite time. Local Rule 230(l).
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

18

1. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s

19

motion to compel his discovery responses within twenty-one (21) days from the

20

date of service of this order; and

21

2. Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in a

22

recommendation to dismiss this action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.

23

24 IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated:
26
27
28

April 5, 2016

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE