Bryant v. Apotex Inc et al

Filing 42

ORDER to VACATE Hearing and to Set Briefing Schedule 39 , 41 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/30/12. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
KEVIN D. BRYANT,

CASE NO. CV F 12-1377 LJO JLT

12
Plaintiff,

ORDER TO VACATE HEARING AND TO
SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE
(Docs. 39, 41.)

13
vs.
14
APOTEX INC., et al.,
15
Defendant.
16
/
17
18

Plaintiff proceeds pro se and is incarcerated. Defendants filed a F.R.Civ.P. 12(c) motion for

19

judgment on the pleadings and set a January 23, 2013 hearing in violation of Local Rule 230(l). As such,

20

this Court:

21

1.

VACATES the January 23, 2013 hearing and ORDERS no party to appear on that date;

22

2.

ORDERS plaintiff, no later than December 22, 2012, to file and serve papers to oppose

23
24
25

defendants’ F.R.Civ.P. 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings; and
3.

ORDERS defendants, no later than December 29, 2012, to file and serve at their option
reply papers.

26

This Court will consider defendants’ F.R.Civ.P. 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings on

27

the record without oral argument, unless this Court orders otherwise. This Court ADMONISHES the

28

parties and counsel that they are expected to obey the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court’s
1

1

Local Rules and orders and are subject to sanctions as this Court deems appropriate.

2
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
66h44d

November 30, 2012

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2