Bryant v. Apotex Inc et al

Filing 48

ORDER RE: Defendants' Ex Parte Application to Modify Briefing Schedule 46 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/18/13: Defendants' joint reply brief due no later than January 25, 2013; The Court will instruct the Clerk of Court to file and docket Plaintiff's opposition papers. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KEVIN D. BRYANT,

12

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE
APPLICATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING
SCHEDULE

Plaintiff,

13
14

Case No. 1:12-cv-01377 LJO JLT

vs.
APOTEX, INC., et al.,

15

(Doc. 46)

Defendants.

16

/

17

On January 17, 2013, Defendants filed an ex parte application to modify the briefing schedule

18

regarding their motion for judgment on the pleadings. The Court has considered the application and

19

finds good cause to modify the briefing schedule. Accordingly, Defendants shall file their joint reply

20

brief by no later than January 25, 2013. Further, in the interest of justice and judicial economy, the

21

Court will instruct the Clerk of Court to file and docket Plaintiff’s opposition papers.1

22
23
24
25
26
27

IT IS SO ORDERED.

January 18, 2013

Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
66h44d
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28
1

Plaintiff served Defendants with his opposition but failed to file the document with the Court. Defendants have,
however, attached a true copy of Plaintiff’s opposition papers to their ex parte application. (Doc. 46-2, Exs. B & C.)