Jesse Washington v. Samuels

Filing 12

ORDER denying as moot 11 Motion for request for status signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/29/2013. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 CASE No. 1:12-cv-01404-AWI-SAB (PC) JESSE WASHINGTON, Plaintiff 7 v. 8 9 10 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR STATUS AS MOOT (ECF No. 11) R. SAMUELS, Defendant. Plaintiff Jesse Washington (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 11 pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was filed on 12 August 27, 2012. (ECF No. 1.) On August 28, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting a status 13 update. (ECF No. 11.) The Court notifies Plaintiff’s that his complaint is currently in the 14 screening stage. Future requests for status updates will be denied. 15 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 16 government entity or officer or employee of a government entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). This 17 Court and its staff takes its role serious in complying with statutes and other obligations under the 18 United States Constitution and laws of the United States. As Plaintiff’s case is not the only case 19 under consideration by the Court and because cases are screened in the order in which they are 20 filed, absent good cause, the Court will screen cases in that order and will continue strive to avoid 21 delays whenever possible. Accordingly, 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for a status update. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 29, 2013 _ _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?