Jesse Washington v. Samuels
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING 17 Findings and Recommendations and REFERRING Matter Back to Magistrate Judge for Issuance of Service Order, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/13/2014. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JESSE WASHINGTON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
R. SAMUELS, et al.,
15
Defendant.
16
Case No.: 1:12-cv-01404-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND REFERRING
MATTER BACK TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR
ISSUANCE OF SERVICE ORDER
[ECF No. 17]
Plaintiff Jesse Washington is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
19
The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
20
636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 28, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and
21
Recommendations which was served on Plaintiff and contained notice that Objections to the Findings
22
and Recommendations were to be filed within ten days. On February 5, 2014, Plaintiff filed a non-
23
opposition to the Findings and Recommendations.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de
25
novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and
26
Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The Findings and Recommendations, filed on January 28, 2014, is adopted in full; and
3
2.
This action shall proceed solely on Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claim
4
against Defendant R. Samuels and all other claims are DISMISSED, without leave to
5
amend, for failure to state a cognizable claim.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated: February 13, 2014
9
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?