Jesse Washington v. Samuels

Filing 85

ORDER SETTING Settlement Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/4/16. Settlement Conference set for 2/19/2016 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 JESSE WASHINGTON, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 Case No.: 1:12-cv-01404-DAD-SAB (PC) v. ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE R. SAMUELS, 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff Jesse Washington is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 19 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 The Court has determined that this case will benefit from a 20 settlement conference. Therefore, this case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng 21 to conduct a settlement conference at California State Prison, Corcoran (CSP-COR), 4001 King 22 Avenue, Corcoran, California 93212 on February 19, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. 23 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng 25 on February 19, 2016, at 11:00 a.m. at CSP-COR. 26 2. A representative with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a binding settlement on the defendants’ behalf shall attend in person. 27 28 1 Both parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. (ECF Nos. 36, 82, 84.) 1 1 2 3. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and damages. 3 The failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to this order to appear in 4 person may result in the imposition of sanctions. In addition, the conference will not 5 proceed and will be reset to another date. 6 4. The parties are directed to submit their confidential settlement conference statements 7 to the court using the following email address: mjsorders@caed.uscourts.gov. 8 Plaintiff shall mail his confidential settlement statement addressed to Laurie Yu, 9 Courtroom Deputy to Magistrate Judge Seng, USDC CAED, P.O. Box 575, 10 Yosemite, CA 95389. The envelope shall be marked “Confidential Settlement 11 Statement.” If a party desires to share additional confidential information with the 12 court, they may do so pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 270(d) and (e). Upon 13 submission of confidential settlement statements, each party shall file on the docket a 14 “Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement Statement.” Statements are due at 15 least 7 days prior to the settlement conference. 16 5. Settlement statements should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on 17 any other party. Settlement statements shall be clearly marked “confidential” with 18 the date and time of the settlement conference indicated prominently thereon. 19 The confidential settlement statement shall be no longer than five pages in length, 20 typed or neatly printed, and include the following: 21 a. A brief statement of the facts of the case. 22 b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon 23 which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties’ likelihood of 24 prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in 25 dispute. 26 c. A summary of the proceedings to date. 27 d. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial, and 28 trial. 2 1 2 e. The relief sought. 3 f. The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a 4 history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands. g. A brief statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the settlement 5 6 conference. 7 6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Litigation 8 Coordinator at California State Prison, Corcoran, via facsimile at (559) 992-7372. 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 4, 2016 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?