Jesse Washington v. Samuels
Filing
85
ORDER SETTING Settlement Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/4/16. Settlement Conference set for 2/19/2016 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
JESSE WASHINGTON,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
Case No.: 1:12-cv-01404-DAD-SAB (PC)
v.
ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
R. SAMUELS,
16
Defendant.
17
18
Plaintiff Jesse Washington is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
19
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 The Court has determined that this case will benefit from a
20
settlement conference. Therefore, this case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng
21
to conduct a settlement conference at California State Prison, Corcoran (CSP-COR), 4001 King
22
Avenue, Corcoran, California 93212 on February 19, 2016 at 11:00 a.m.
23
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
24
1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng
25
on February 19, 2016, at 11:00 a.m. at CSP-COR.
26
2. A representative with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a binding
settlement on the defendants’ behalf shall attend in person.
27
28
1
Both parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. (ECF Nos. 36, 82, 84.)
1
1
2
3. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and damages.
3
The failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to this order to appear in
4
person may result in the imposition of sanctions. In addition, the conference will not
5
proceed and will be reset to another date.
6
4. The parties are directed to submit their confidential settlement conference statements
7
to the court using the following email address: mjsorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
8
Plaintiff shall mail his confidential settlement statement addressed to Laurie Yu,
9
Courtroom Deputy to Magistrate Judge Seng, USDC CAED, P.O. Box 575,
10
Yosemite, CA 95389. The envelope shall be marked “Confidential Settlement
11
Statement.” If a party desires to share additional confidential information with the
12
court, they may do so pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 270(d) and (e). Upon
13
submission of confidential settlement statements, each party shall file on the docket a
14
“Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement Statement.” Statements are due at
15
least 7 days prior to the settlement conference.
16
5. Settlement statements should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on
17
any other party. Settlement statements shall be clearly marked “confidential” with
18
the date and time of the settlement conference indicated prominently thereon.
19
The confidential settlement statement shall be no longer than five pages in length,
20
typed or neatly printed, and include the following:
21
a. A brief statement of the facts of the case.
22
b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon
23
which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties’ likelihood of
24
prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in
25
dispute.
26
c. A summary of the proceedings to date.
27
d. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial, and
28
trial.
2
1
2
e. The relief sought.
3
f. The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a
4
history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands.
g. A brief statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the settlement
5
6
conference.
7
6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Litigation
8
Coordinator at California State Prison, Corcoran, via facsimile at (559) 992-7372.
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 4, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?