David Hill v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 13

ORDER granting extension of time and modifying scheduling order. The Commissioners confidential letter brief shall be served on or before July 10, 2013; Any stipulation to remand the case shall be filed on or before July 25, 2013; Plaintiffs opening brief shall be filed on or before August 26, 2013;Commissioners responsive brief shall be filed on or before September 25, 2013; and plaintiff may file a reply brief on or before October 2, 2013. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A Boone on 6/20/2013. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID HILL, 12 13 Case No.: 1:12-cv-01420-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME AND MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER v. (ECF No. 12) 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 On May 21, 2013, Plaintiff filed a stipulation requesting an extension of time to serve the 19 Commissioner with a confidential letter brief as required by the Court’s scheduling order. (ECF 20 No. 12.) 21 confidential letter brief on or before June 5, 2013. This request is granted, and the scheduling 22 order is modified as follows: 23 1. Pursuant to the stipulation, Plaintiff will have served the Commissioner with a The Commissioner’s confidential letter brief shall be served on or before July 10, 2013; 24 25 2. Any stipulation to remand the case shall be filed on or before July 25, 2013; 26 3. Plaintiff’s opening brief shall be filed on or before August 26, 2013; 27 4. Commissioner’s responsive brief shall be filed on or before September 25, 2013; 28 and 1 1 5. Plaintiff may file a reply brief on or before October 2, 2013. 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 June 20, 2013 _ _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?