David Hill v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 19

ORDER DISCHARGING Court's Order to Show Cause, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/2/2013. (7 - Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID HILL, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 1:12-cv-01420-SAB ORDER DISCHARGING COURT’S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Plaintiff, v. ECF NO. 16 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. 16 17 On September 24, 2013, the Court ordered Plaintiff David Hill (“Plaintiff”) to show 18 cause why this action should not be dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 16.) 19 Plaintiff did not file an opening brief in this action, which was due September 24, 2013 and did 20 not request an extension of time. 21 On October 1, 2013 Plaintiff filed his opening brief along with a response to the Court’s 22 order to show cause. (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff indicated that he inadvertently missed the filing 23 deadline for his opening brief due to a calendaring error. 24 Due to the delay associated with Plaintiff’s calendaring error, the Court will modify the 25 briefing schedule as follows: Plaintiff’s reply, if any, to Defendant’s opposition shall be due 26 within seven (7) days of the date of service of Defendant’s opposition, instead of the customary 27 fifteen (15) days. If no reply is filed within seven (7) days of the date of service of Defendant’s 28 opposition, Plaintiff’s right to file a reply will be deemed waived. 1 1 In accordance with the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERD that: 2 1. The scheduling order in this action is modified such that Plaintiff’s reply to 3 Defendant’s opposition shall be due within seven (7) days of the date of service of 4 Defendant’s opposition; and 5 2. The Court’s September 24, 2013 order to show cause is DISCHARGED. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: October 2, 2013 _ 9 _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?