Valencia v. Gibson et al

Filing 31

ORDER Denying as Moot Plaintiff's 25 Motion for Clarification signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 07/30/2014. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ABEL VALENCIA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. CONNIE GIPSON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION [ECF No. 25] pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 23, 2014, the Court found service of the complaint appropriate and forwarded 19 20 Case No.: 1:12-cv-01446-AWI-SAB (PC) Plaintiff Abel Valencia is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff the necessary service of process documents. On May 19, 2014, Plaintiff submitted the complete service of process documents, along with a 21 22 motion for clarification of the Court’s April 23, 2014, order. In the motion, Plaintiff indicates he is 23 unclear as to how many copies of the relevant CDCR 602 inmate appeal grievances is required for 24 service of process. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 However, at this time all defendants have been served. Therefore, Plaintiff’s pending motion 1 2 for clarification is DENIED as MOOT. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 July 30, 2014 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?