Kennedy v. Kings Mosquito Abatement District et al

Filing 67

Order Re: Identification of Personnel as Related to Personnel Documents Previously Produced Pursuant to the June 11, 2014, Order of the Court, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/21/2014. (Yu, L)

1
2
3
4
5

Rissa A. Stuart #166459
KAHN, SOARES & CONWAY, LLP
Attorneys at Law
219 North Douty Street
Hanford, California 93230
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for: Plaintiff, JOSEPH KENNEDY

6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTREN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11

JOSEPH KENNEDY,

Case No. 1:12-CV-01458-AWI-MJS

Plaintiff,

12
vs.

ORDER RE: IDENTIFICATION OF
PERSONNEL AS RELATED TO
PERSONNEL DOCUMENTS
PREVIOUSLY PRODUCED PURSUANT
TO THE JUNE 11, 2014, ORDER OF
THE COURT

13
14
15

KINGS MOSQUITO ABATEMENT
DISTRICT; MICHAEL CAVANAGH, an
individual; DAVID HICKEY, an individual;
and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive

16
17

Defendants.

18

The parties herein, by and through their counsel, appeared before Magistrate Judge

19

Michael J. Seng on November 18, 2014, regarding Plaintiff’s request for further identification

20

related to the personnel records produced by Defendant, District. As a result of the conferences

21

held between counsel and the Magistrate, this Order is being drafted to outline the information to

22
23

be produced and the parameters of the same by Defendants.

Specifically, the parties

24

acknowledged that the personnel files of individuals were previously produced by Defendants to

25

Plaintiff’s counsel, however, without any identifying information. Specifically, employee files

26

were produced and identified as Employees 1 through 13. The court now orders Defendant

27

District to provide Plaintiff with the identification, i.e., the names of the employees previously

28
29
30

1

1
2

identified as Employees 1 through 13. Said information shall be produced and used pursuant to
the Protective Order signed by the Magistrate on or about June 9, 2014.

3

The individuals identified as employees 1 through 13 were provided with the opportunity

4

to formally object to this court regarding the production of their personnel files and did not object

5

within the time identified.

Therefore, these individuals have waived any objection to the

6
7
8

production of their file materials and/or identification by name.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

9
10

DATED:

LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE

11

By:___/s/Michael E. Lehman_______________.
Michael E. Lehman
Attorneys for Defendants, Kings Mosquito
Abatement District; Michael Cavanagh, an
individual; and David Hickey, an individual

12
13
14
15

ORDER

16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
19

Dated:

November 21, 2014

/s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

Michael J. Seng

2