Kennedy v. Kings Mosquito Abatement District et al

Filing 67

Order Re: Identification of Personnel as Related to Personnel Documents Previously Produced Pursuant to the June 11, 2014, Order of the Court, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/21/2014. (Yu, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Rissa A. Stuart #166459 KAHN, SOARES & CONWAY, LLP Attorneys at Law 219 North Douty Street Hanford, California 93230 Telephone: (559) 584-3337 Facsimile: (559) 584-3348 Attorneys for: Plaintiff, JOSEPH KENNEDY 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTREN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 JOSEPH KENNEDY, Case No. 1:12-CV-01458-AWI-MJS Plaintiff, 12 vs. ORDER RE: IDENTIFICATION OF PERSONNEL AS RELATED TO PERSONNEL DOCUMENTS PREVIOUSLY PRODUCED PURSUANT TO THE JUNE 11, 2014, ORDER OF THE COURT 13 14 15 KINGS MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT; MICHAEL CAVANAGH, an individual; DAVID HICKEY, an individual; and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive 16 17 Defendants. 18 The parties herein, by and through their counsel, appeared before Magistrate Judge 19 Michael J. Seng on November 18, 2014, regarding Plaintiff’s request for further identification 20 related to the personnel records produced by Defendant, District. As a result of the conferences 21 held between counsel and the Magistrate, this Order is being drafted to outline the information to 22 23 be produced and the parameters of the same by Defendants. Specifically, the parties 24 acknowledged that the personnel files of individuals were previously produced by Defendants to 25 Plaintiff’s counsel, however, without any identifying information. Specifically, employee files 26 were produced and identified as Employees 1 through 13. The court now orders Defendant 27 District to provide Plaintiff with the identification, i.e., the names of the employees previously 28 29 30 1 1 2 identified as Employees 1 through 13. Said information shall be produced and used pursuant to the Protective Order signed by the Magistrate on or about June 9, 2014. 3 The individuals identified as employees 1 through 13 were provided with the opportunity 4 to formally object to this court regarding the production of their personnel files and did not object 5 within the time identified. Therefore, these individuals have waived any objection to the 6 7 8 production of their file materials and/or identification by name. APPROVED AS TO FORM: 9 10 DATED: LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 11 By:___/s/Michael E. Lehman_______________. Michael E. Lehman Attorneys for Defendants, Kings Mosquito Abatement District; Michael Cavanagh, an individual; and David Hickey, an individual 12 13 14 15 ORDER 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 Dated: November 21, 2014 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Michael J. Seng 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?