Vargas De Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
40
STIPULATION (Doc. 39) and ORDER for the AWARD and PAYMENT of ATTORNEY FEES and EXPENSES PURSUANT to the EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED t hat Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($5,500.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010) and subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/2/2015. (Herman, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
BENJAMIN WAGNER CSBN 163581
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
MARLA K. LETELLIER, CSBN 234969
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8928
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Marla.Letellier@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
FRESNO DIVISION
12
13
RITA VARGAS DE RODRIGUEZ,
14
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:12-CV-01469-AWI-BAM
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE
AWARD AND PAYMENT OF
ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS
TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d),
AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §
1920
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned
counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees in the
amount of FIVE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($5,500.00) under the Equal
Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This amount represents compensation for
all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action,
in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d).
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider
the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel Sengthiene Bosavanh, Esq
1
1
(Counsel). Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91
2
(2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any
3
offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the
4
order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any
5
offset.
6
Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury
7
determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the
8
payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Counsel, pursuant to the assignment
9
executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Counsel.
10
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA
11
attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under
12
the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release
13
from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Counsel, including Counsel’s firm,
14
may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.
15
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Counsel and/or Counsel’s firm to seek
16
Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause
17
provisions of the EAJA.
18
Respectfully submitted,
19
Dated: January 31, 2015
SENGTHIENE BOSAVANH, Esq.
20
By:
21
22
23
24
Dated: January 31, 2015
/s/ Sengthiene Bosovanh
SENGTHIENE BOSOVANH
* By email authorization on 1/31/15
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BENJAMIN WAGNER
United States Attorney
25
26
27
28
By:
/s/ Marla K. Letellier
MARLA K. LETELLIER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
2
ORDER
1
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded
3
attorney fees in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($5,500.00), as
4
authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010) and subject
5
to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
February 2, 2015
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?