Brown v. Harris et al
Filing
15
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 14 Request for Entry of Default signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 09/23/2013. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CORNELL BROWN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
1:12-cv-01472-GSA-PC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF=S
REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT
(Doc. 14.)
vs.
C/O R. HARRIS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
I.
BACKGROUND
Cornell Brown (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
19
with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint
20
commencing this action on September 10, 2012. (Doc. 1.) On September 10, 2012, Plaintiff
21
consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction in this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(c), and no
22
other parties have made an appearance. (Doc. 5.) Therefore, pursuant to Appendix A(k)(4) of
23
the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California, the undersigned shall conduct any and all
24
proceedings in the case until such time as reassignment to a District Judge is required. Local
25
Rule Appendix A(k)(3). This case now proceeds on Plaintiff’s initial Complaint, against
26
defendant Harris for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and defendant
27
Nelson for failure to protect Plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
28
1
1
On September 20, 2013, Plaintiff filed a request for entry of default against the
2
defendants to this action. (Doc. 14.)
3
II.
ENTRY OF DEFAULT
4
Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a judgment for affirmative
5
relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by the Federal Rules of
6
Civil Procedure and where that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
7
55(a). Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, A[A] defendant must serve an
8
answer within 21 days after being served with the summons and complaint; or if it has timely
9
waived service under Rule 4(d), within 60 days after the request for a waiver was sent.@ Fed.
10
R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A). Under Rule 4(d), a defendant may waive service of a summons by
11
signing and returning a waiver of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). If a defendant fails to plead or
12
otherwise defend an action after being properly served with a summons and complaint, a
13
default judgment may be entered pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil
14
Procedure.
15
Plaintiff’s Request
16
Plaintiff requests entry of default against the defendants to this action. Plaintiff asserts
17
that court records indicate that on May 5, 2013, the defendants were served by the United
18
States Marshal (“Marshal”) with a copy of the summons and complaint. Plaintiff argues that
19
default should be entered against the defendants because more than twenty days have elapsed
20
since they were served, and they failed to plead or otherwise defend in this action.
21
Discussion
22
Court records do not reflect Plaintiff’s assertion that the defendants were served with
23
process on May 5, 2013. (Court Record.) On May 23, 2013, the court issued an order directing
24
the United States Marshal (“Marshal”) to serve process in this action upon defendants Harris
25
and Nelson (“Defendants”). (Doc. 8.) To date, the court has not received any notice that
26
Defendants were served or that service by the Marshal was unsuccessful. (Court Record.)
27
Plaintiff has not shown that Defendants were properly served with process and failed to plead
28
2
1
or otherwise defend pursuant to Rule 55(a). Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Therefore, Plaintiff’s
2
request for entry of default must be denied.
3
III.
4
5
CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff=s request for entry of
default against Defendants, filed on September 20, 2013, is DENIED.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
10
11
12
September 23, 2013
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
6i0kij8d
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?