Brown v. Harris et al

Filing 15

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 14 Request for Entry of Default signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 09/23/2013. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CORNELL BROWN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 1:12-cv-01472-GSA-PC ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF=S REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT (Doc. 14.) vs. C/O R. HARRIS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 I. BACKGROUND Cornell Brown (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 19 with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint 20 commencing this action on September 10, 2012. (Doc. 1.) On September 10, 2012, Plaintiff 21 consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction in this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(c), and no 22 other parties have made an appearance. (Doc. 5.) Therefore, pursuant to Appendix A(k)(4) of 23 the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California, the undersigned shall conduct any and all 24 proceedings in the case until such time as reassignment to a District Judge is required. Local 25 Rule Appendix A(k)(3). This case now proceeds on Plaintiff’s initial Complaint, against 26 defendant Harris for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and defendant 27 Nelson for failure to protect Plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 28 1 1 On September 20, 2013, Plaintiff filed a request for entry of default against the 2 defendants to this action. (Doc. 14.) 3 II. ENTRY OF DEFAULT 4 Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a judgment for affirmative 5 relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by the Federal Rules of 6 Civil Procedure and where that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 7 55(a). Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, A[A] defendant must serve an 8 answer within 21 days after being served with the summons and complaint; or if it has timely 9 waived service under Rule 4(d), within 60 days after the request for a waiver was sent.@ Fed. 10 R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A). Under Rule 4(d), a defendant may waive service of a summons by 11 signing and returning a waiver of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). If a defendant fails to plead or 12 otherwise defend an action after being properly served with a summons and complaint, a 13 default judgment may be entered pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil 14 Procedure. 15 Plaintiff’s Request 16 Plaintiff requests entry of default against the defendants to this action. Plaintiff asserts 17 that court records indicate that on May 5, 2013, the defendants were served by the United 18 States Marshal (“Marshal”) with a copy of the summons and complaint. Plaintiff argues that 19 default should be entered against the defendants because more than twenty days have elapsed 20 since they were served, and they failed to plead or otherwise defend in this action. 21 Discussion 22 Court records do not reflect Plaintiff’s assertion that the defendants were served with 23 process on May 5, 2013. (Court Record.) On May 23, 2013, the court issued an order directing 24 the United States Marshal (“Marshal”) to serve process in this action upon defendants Harris 25 and Nelson (“Defendants”). (Doc. 8.) To date, the court has not received any notice that 26 Defendants were served or that service by the Marshal was unsuccessful. (Court Record.) 27 Plaintiff has not shown that Defendants were properly served with process and failed to plead 28 2 1 or otherwise defend pursuant to Rule 55(a). Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Therefore, Plaintiff’s 2 request for entry of default must be denied. 3 III. 4 5 CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff=s request for entry of default against Defendants, filed on September 20, 2013, is DENIED. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10 11 12 September 23, 2013 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 6i0kij8d 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?