Schuster v. Johnson

Filing 16

ORDER VACATING Hearing Date Set for Motion to Dismiss signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/17/2012. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 LARISSA SCHUSTER, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 15 16 vs. DEBORAH K. JOHNSON, Respondent. ) Case No.:12-cv-01482-AWI-DLB (HC) ) ) ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE SET ) FOR MOTION TO DISMISS ) ) ) ) ) ) 17 Petitioner is proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 18 19 20 21 22 23 2254. Petitioner is represented by Roger Nuttall, Esq. On December 14, 2012, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition as untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Respondent’s counsel set the motion for hearing before the undersigned on March 1, 2013 at 9:00a.m. Because this Court’s order of October 16, 2012, advised that “[a]ll motions shall be 24 submitted on the record and briefs filed without oral argument unless otherwise ordered by the 25 Court,” the Court will hereby vacate the hearing date, and after the expiration of the time for 26 filing an opposition and reply, the Court will either take the matter under submission or set a 27 hearing date, if necessary. 28 1 1 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing date set for March 1, 2013, at 2 3 9:00 a.m. before the undersigned is VACATED. 4 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 Dated: /s/ Dennis December 17, 2012 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: ah0l4d 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?