Schuster v. Johnson
Filing
16
ORDER VACATING Hearing Date Set for Motion to Dismiss signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/17/2012. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
LARISSA SCHUSTER,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
15
16
vs.
DEBORAH K. JOHNSON,
Respondent.
) Case No.:12-cv-01482-AWI-DLB (HC)
)
) ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE SET
) FOR MOTION TO DISMISS
)
)
)
)
)
)
17
Petitioner is proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
18
19
20
21
22
23
2254. Petitioner is represented by Roger Nuttall, Esq.
On December 14, 2012, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition as untimely
under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Respondent’s counsel set the motion for hearing before the
undersigned on March 1, 2013 at 9:00a.m.
Because this Court’s order of October 16, 2012, advised that “[a]ll motions shall be
24
submitted on the record and briefs filed without oral argument unless otherwise ordered by the
25
Court,” the Court will hereby vacate the hearing date, and after the expiration of the time for
26
filing an opposition and reply, the Court will either take the matter under submission or set a
27
hearing date, if necessary.
28
1
1
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing date set for March 1, 2013, at
2
3
9:00 a.m. before the undersigned is VACATED.
4
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
December 17, 2012
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
ah0l4d
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?