J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Aranda
Filing
6
Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for an Order Continuing Initial Scheduling Conference 5 ; and ORDER: Initial SCHEDULING CONFERENCE is continued from 12/13/2012 to January 29, 2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/7/2012. (Herman, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Thomas P. Riley, SBN 194706
LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C.
First Library Square
1114 Fremont Avenue
South Pasadena, CA 91030
Tel: 626-799-9797
Fax: 626-799-9795
TPRLAW@att.net
Attorneys for Plaintiff
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRESNO DIVISION
8
9
10
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.,
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01508-AWI-BAM
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
vs.
RUBEN GARCIA ARANDA, et al.
PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE
APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER
CONTINUING INITIAL SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE; AND ORDER
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
TO THE HONORABLE BARBARA A. MCAULIFFE ARMSTRONG, THE PARTIES
AND THEIR ATTORNEY/S OF RECORD:
Plaintiff J & J Sports Productions, Inc., hereby applies ex parte for an order continuing the
21
Initial Scheduling Conference in this action, presently set for Thursday, December 13, 2012 at 9:00 AM
22
to a new date approximately thirty (30) to forty-five (45) days forward. This request is necessitated by
23
the fact that the Defendant Ruben Garcia Aranda has not yet answered Plaintiff’s Complaint (despite
24
service of suit papers).
25
As such, as of this writing, Plaintiff has yet to receive an answer or any other responsive
26
pleading from the defendants. As a result, Plaintiff’s counsel has not conferred with the defendants
27
concerning the claims, discovery, settlement, ADR or any of the other pertinent issues involving the
28
PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND ORDER
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01508-AWI-BAM
PAGE 1
1
case itself or the preparation of a Initial Scheduling Conference Statement1.
2
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Honorable Court continue the Initial
3
4
Scheduling Conference presently scheduled for Thursday, December 13, 2012 to a new date
approximately thirty (30) to forty-five (45) days forward.
5
6
7
8
Respectfully submitted,
9
10
11
12
Dated: December 6, 2012
13
14
15
/s/ Thomas P. Riley
LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C.
By: Thomas P. Riley
Attorneys for Plaintiff
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
16
17
///
18
///
19
///
20
21
///
///
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
26
27
///
///
///
28
1
Plaintiff is informed and believes that defendant Ruben Garcia Aranda has been served on or about November 25, 2012.
As such, as of this writing Plaintiff has yet to receive an answer or any other responsive pleading from the defendant.
PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND ORDER
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01508-AWI-BAM
PAGE 2
ORDER
1
2
The Court, having considered Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion to Continue Initial Scheduling, and
3
for good cause being shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference is
4
continued from December 13, 2012 at 9:00am to January 29, 2013 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 8
5
6
7
before Judge McAuliffe. A JOINT Scheduling Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed
by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in full compliance with the requirements set forth in the
8
Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference, one (1) full week prior to the Scheduling
9
Conference,
10
and
a
copy
shall
be
e-mailed,
in
WordPerfect
or
Word
format,
bamorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The parties may appear by telephone.
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
Dated:
15
16
17
December 7, 2012
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
10c20kb8554
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND ORDER
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01508-AWI-BAM
PAGE 3
_
to
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?