J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Aranda

Filing 6

Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for an Order Continuing Initial Scheduling Conference 5 ; and ORDER: Initial SCHEDULING CONFERENCE is continued from 12/13/2012 to January 29, 2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/7/2012. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Thomas P. Riley, SBN 194706 LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C. First Library Square 1114 Fremont Avenue South Pasadena, CA 91030 Tel: 626-799-9797 Fax: 626-799-9795 TPRLAW@att.net Attorneys for Plaintiff J & J Sports Productions, Inc. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION 8 9 10 J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01508-AWI-BAM 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 vs. RUBEN GARCIA ARANDA, et al. PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; AND ORDER 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 TO THE HONORABLE BARBARA A. MCAULIFFE ARMSTRONG, THE PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEY/S OF RECORD: Plaintiff J & J Sports Productions, Inc., hereby applies ex parte for an order continuing the 21 Initial Scheduling Conference in this action, presently set for Thursday, December 13, 2012 at 9:00 AM 22 to a new date approximately thirty (30) to forty-five (45) days forward. This request is necessitated by 23 the fact that the Defendant Ruben Garcia Aranda has not yet answered Plaintiff’s Complaint (despite 24 service of suit papers). 25 As such, as of this writing, Plaintiff has yet to receive an answer or any other responsive 26 pleading from the defendants. As a result, Plaintiff’s counsel has not conferred with the defendants 27 concerning the claims, discovery, settlement, ADR or any of the other pertinent issues involving the 28 PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND ORDER CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01508-AWI-BAM PAGE 1 1 case itself or the preparation of a Initial Scheduling Conference Statement1. 2 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Honorable Court continue the Initial 3 4 Scheduling Conference presently scheduled for Thursday, December 13, 2012 to a new date approximately thirty (30) to forty-five (45) days forward. 5 6 7 8 Respectfully submitted, 9 10 11 12 Dated: December 6, 2012 13 14 15 /s/ Thomas P. Riley LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C. By: Thomas P. Riley Attorneys for Plaintiff J & J Sports Productions, Inc. 16 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 21 /// /// /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 26 27 /// /// /// 28 1 Plaintiff is informed and believes that defendant Ruben Garcia Aranda has been served on or about November 25, 2012. As such, as of this writing Plaintiff has yet to receive an answer or any other responsive pleading from the defendant. PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND ORDER CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01508-AWI-BAM PAGE 2 ORDER 1 2 The Court, having considered Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion to Continue Initial Scheduling, and 3 for good cause being shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference is 4 continued from December 13, 2012 at 9:00am to January 29, 2013 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 8 5 6 7 before Judge McAuliffe. A JOINT Scheduling Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in full compliance with the requirements set forth in the 8 Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference, one (1) full week prior to the Scheduling 9 Conference, 10 and a copy shall be e-mailed, in WordPerfect or Word format, bamorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The parties may appear by telephone. 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 Dated: 15 16 17 December 7, 2012 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 10c20kb8554 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND ORDER CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01508-AWI-BAM PAGE 3 _ to

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?