Bealer v. Warden of K.V.S.P. et al

Filing 137

ORDER GRANTING defendants' motion for an extension of time 5/20/2016 to respond to plaintiff's discovery requests as ordered by the Court, document 136 . Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/13/2016. (Rooney, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANTWOINE BEALER,

12
13
14
15

1:12-cv-01516-DAD-EPG-PC
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
DISCOVERY REQUESTS AS
ORDERED BY THE COURT
(ECF No. 136.)

Plaintiff,
vs.
R. BRANNUM, et al.,
Defendants.

DEADLINE: MAY 20, 2016

16
17
18
19
20

Antwoine Bealer (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

21

On May 13, 2016, Defendants filed a motion for extension of time to respond to

22

Plaintiff’s discovery requests as ordered by the Court at the April 28, 2016 hearing. (ECF No.

23

136.) The Court originally ordered the responses due on May 13, 2016; however, to date the

24

Court has not issued the order following the hearing, outlining the exact phrasing of the

25

questions and the formatting requirements. (Sloan Decl., ECF No. 136 at 2 ¶5.) Defendants

26

have diligently prepared their responses based on notes taken at the hearing.

27

However, they want to be confident their responses fully address all items ordered of them.

28

(Id.) Defendants request an additional 7 days, up to and including May 20, 2016, to respond.
1

(Id. ¶6.)

1

Defendants have shown good cause for the Court to grant their motion for extension of

2

time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are granted an extension of

3

time until May 20, 2016, in which to respond to Plaintiff’s discovery requests as ordered by the

4

Court at the April 28, 2016 hearing.

5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 13, 2016

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

23
24
25
26
27
28
2