Bealer v. Warden of K.V.S.P. et al

Filing 31

ORDER STRIKING 26 28 Supplemental Objections as Untimely signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/17/2014. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTWOINE BEALER, 12 13 14 15 1:12-cv-01516-AWI-GSA-PC Plaintiff, ORDER STRIKING SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AS UNTIMELY (Docs. 26, 28.) vs. KVSP WARDEN, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 Antwoine Bealer (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. 19 On May 8, 2014, the Court entered findings and recommendations, recommending that 20 this action proceed only against defendants Rios and Brannum on Plaintiff=s claims for use of 21 excessive force, and that all other claims and defendants be dismissed from this action based on 22 Plaintiff=s failure to state a claim. (Doc. 22.) Plaintiff was granted thirty days in which to file 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. (Id.) On June 11, 2014, Plaintiff filed 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. (Doc. 24.) On July 21, 2014, Plaintiff filed 25 supplemental objections. 26 supplemental objections. (Doc. 28.) (Doc. 26.) On August 21, 2014, Plaintiff filed additional 27 Plaintiff’s supplemental objections of July 21, 2014 and August 21, 2014 were filed 28 well after the thirty day deadline. Plaintiff did not request leave of court to file supplemental 1 1 objections or an extension of time. Therefore Plaintiff’s supplemental objections shall be 2 stricken as untimely.1 3 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s supplemental objections of July 21, 2014 and August 21, 2014 are STRICKEN from the record as untimely. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 17, 2014 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 28 When a document is stricken, it becomes a nullity and is not considered by the court for any purpose. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?