Bealer v. Warden of K.V.S.P. et al
Filing
47
ORDER RE Plaintiff's Letter to the Clerk signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/8/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTOINE BEALER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
1:12-cv-01516-AWI-GSA-PC
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S LETTER TO
THE CLERK
(Doc. 46.)
R. BRANNUM, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
Antoine Bealer ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
19
with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint
20
commencing this action on September 14, 2012. (Doc. 1.) This case now proceeds on the
21
Fourth Amended Complaint filed on March 28, 2014, against defendants Rios and Brannum for
22
use of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Doc. 21.) This case is presently
23
in the discovery phase, pursuant to the court’s scheduling order of March 2, 2015. (Doc. 45.)
24
On April 7, 2015, Plaintiff submitted a letter to the Clerk in which he alleged an
25
incident occurring on March 24, 2015, during which prison officials detained him in
26
Administrative Segregation on false charges. Plaintiff informs the court that he believes this
27
shows “another, more extreme, act of harassment and retaliation for the lawsuit I have filed.”
28
Doc. 46.)
1
1
Plaintiff is advised that this lawsuit now proceeds only against defendants Rios and
2
Brannum for use of excessive force, arising from events occurring before Plaintiff filed this
3
action. On October 29, 2014, the court issued an order dismissing all other claims and
4
defendants from this case. (Doc. 33.) Plaintiff may not add new allegations of harassment and
5
retaliation to this action without leave of court.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 8, 2015
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?