Bealer v. Warden of K.V.S.P. et al

Filing 47

ORDER RE Plaintiff's Letter to the Clerk signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/8/2015. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTOINE BEALER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. 1:12-cv-01516-AWI-GSA-PC ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S LETTER TO THE CLERK (Doc. 46.) R. BRANNUM, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Antoine Bealer ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 19 with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint 20 commencing this action on September 14, 2012. (Doc. 1.) This case now proceeds on the 21 Fourth Amended Complaint filed on March 28, 2014, against defendants Rios and Brannum for 22 use of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Doc. 21.) This case is presently 23 in the discovery phase, pursuant to the court’s scheduling order of March 2, 2015. (Doc. 45.) 24 On April 7, 2015, Plaintiff submitted a letter to the Clerk in which he alleged an 25 incident occurring on March 24, 2015, during which prison officials detained him in 26 Administrative Segregation on false charges. Plaintiff informs the court that he believes this 27 shows “another, more extreme, act of harassment and retaliation for the lawsuit I have filed.” 28 Doc. 46.) 1 1 Plaintiff is advised that this lawsuit now proceeds only against defendants Rios and 2 Brannum for use of excessive force, arising from events occurring before Plaintiff filed this 3 action. On October 29, 2014, the court issued an order dismissing all other claims and 4 defendants from this case. (Doc. 33.) Plaintiff may not add new allegations of harassment and 5 retaliation to this action without leave of court. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 8, 2015 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?