Bealer v. Warden of K.V.S.P. et al
Filing
56
ORDER Denying 51 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief, for Lack of Jurisdiction signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 05/16/2015. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTWOINE BEALER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
1:12-cv-01516-AWI-GSA-PC
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF,
FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
(Doc. 51.)
R. BRANNUM, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
I.
18
BACKGROUND
Antoine Bealer ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
19
with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 14, 2012, Plaintiff
20
filed the Complaint commencing this action. (Doc. 1.) This case now proceeds with the Fourth
21
Amended Complaint filed on March 28, 2014, against defendants Rios and Brannum for use of
22
excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Doc. 21.)
23
24
On May 1, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunctive relief. (Doc. 51.)
II.
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
25
The court lacks jurisdiction to grant Plaintiff’s request. Federal courts are courts of
26
limited jurisdiction and in considering a request for preliminary injunctive relief, the Court is
27
bound by the requirement that as a preliminary matter, it have before it an actual case or
28
controversy. City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 102, 103 S.Ct. 1660, 1665 (1983);
1
1
Valley Forge Christian Coll. v. Ams. United for Separation of Church and State, Inc., 454 U.S.
2
464, 471, 102 S.Ct. 752, 757-58 (1982).
3
controversy before it, it has no power to hear the matter in question. Id.
4
5
If the Court does not have an actual case or
Plaintiff requests relief from being denied access to the court. Specifically, Plaintiff
seeks greater access to the law library and his legal materials.
6
The court lacks jurisdiction to issue the order sought by Plaintiff, because such
7
controversies are not before the court in this case. As discussed above, federal courts are courts
8
of limited jurisdiction and in considering a request for preliminary injunctive relief, the Court is
9
bound by the requirement that as a preliminary matter, it have before it an actual case or
10
controversy. City of Los Angeles, 461 U.S. at 102; Valley Forge Christian Coll., 454 U.S. at
11
471. Here, Plaintiff’s complaint concerns claims for excessive force against defendants based
12
on events occurring in 2010-2011. An order granting Plaintiff access to the law library and his
13
legal materials would not remedy any of the claims upon which this action proceeds.
14
Therefore, Plaintiff’s request for a preliminary injunction must be denied.
15
III.
16
17
CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for
preliminary injunctive relief, filed on May 1, 2015, is DENIED.
18
19
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 16, 2015
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?