Powell v. George, et al.

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/30/2013 striking 17 Petition to Supplement Complaint, Alternatively Petitioning for Leave to Enter Documents to the Docket to Reflect as Record. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 TONY EDWARD POWELL, 9 CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01527-AWI-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S PETITION TO SUPPLEMENT COMPLAINT, ALTERNATIVELY PETITIONING FOR LEAVE TO ENTER DOCUMENTS TO THE DOCKET TO REFLECT AS RECORD (ECF No. 17) v. 10 MADDEN, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 / 13 Plaintiff Tony Edward Powell (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 14 action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 15 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999 (1971). Plaintiff is subject to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and is precluded from 16 proceeding in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 3.) On November 27, 2012, the Court dismissed this action 17 for Plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee and closed this case. (ECF No. 9.) Following repeated 18 motions to reopen this action, the Court informed Plaintiff that any further petitions, motions or 19 filings in this closed action would be stricken from the record. (ECF No. 16.) 20 On January 22, 2013, Plaintiff filed a “Petition to Supplement Complaint, Alternatively 21 Petitioning for Leave to Enter Documents to the Docket to Reflect as Record.” (ECF No. 17.) The 22 petition is unsigned. As unsigned documents cannot be considered by the Court, Plaintiff’s petition 23 is HEREBY STRICKEN from the record. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a); Local Rule 131(b). The Court 24 again admonishes Plaintiff that any further petitions, motions or filings in this closed action will be 25 stricken from the record. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: 10c20k January 30, 2013 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?