Butler v. Wern, et al.

Filing 39

ORDER Adopting Findings And Recommendation, Dismissing Defendant Wern From Action, Without Prejudice, Pursuant To Rule 4(M) Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure (ECF No. 37 ), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/3/2015. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARQUES BUTLER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 R. WERN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Case No.: 1:12-cv-01538-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, DISMISISNG DEFENDANT WERN FROM ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO RULE 4(M) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE [ECF No. 37] Plaintiff Marques Butler is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On June 24, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendation which was 20 served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that Objections to the Findings and 21 Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff filed objections on July 30, 2015. 22 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 23 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Plaintiff’s objections, 24 the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 25 analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on June 24, 2015, is adopted in full; and 3 2. Defendant Wern is DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 4 Procedure 4(m). 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill August 3, 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?