Coalition for Clean Air, Inc., et al v. VWR International, LLC
Filing
9
STIPULATION and ORDER CONTINUING BRIEFING AND HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on October 12, 2012. Motion Hearing currently set for 10/29/2012 is CONTINUED to 11/13/2012 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Munoz, I)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
Adam J. Thurston (SBN 162636)
adam.thurston@dbr.com
Ryan S. Fife (SBN 235000)
ryan.fife@dbr.com
1800 Century Park East, Suite 1400
Los Angeles, California 90067-1517
Telephone:
(310) 203-4000
Facsimile:
(310) 229-1285
Attorneys for Defendant
VWR INTERNATIONAL, LLC
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
COALITION FOR CLEAN AIR, et al.,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
Case No. 1:12-CV-101569-LJO-BAM
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING BRIEFING AND HEARING
SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
VWR INTERNATIONAL, LLC, et al.,
16
Defendant.
17
18
19
Current Hearing Date:
Date: October 29, 2012
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Place: Courtroom 4, 7th Floor
Judge: Hon. Lawrence O’Neil
New Hearing Date:
Date: November 13, 2012
Time: 8:30 a.m.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
D RINKER B IDDLE &
R EATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PHILADELPHIA
LA01/ 1166186.2
STIPULATION & ORDER RE HEARING &
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR P.I. MOTION
1
This Stipulation is made and entered into pursuant to EDCA Local Rules 143, 144,
2
230(f), in the above-captioned action by and between Plaintiffs Coalition for Clean Air, Center
3
For Environmental Health, Association of Irritated Residents, Teamsters Joint Council 7, and
4
Kevin Long (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant VWR International, LLC (“Defendant”) through their
5
respective undersigned counsel:
6
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed the Complaint in this action on September 24, 2012.
7
WHEREAS, Defendant was served with the action on September 26, 2012.
8
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 6) on
9
September 28, 2012, and served Defendant by mail on the same date, per Fed. Rules Civ. Proc.
10
Rules 5, 6.
11
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ preliminary injunction motion noticed a hearing date of October
12
29, 2012, making Defendant’s opposition due on October 15, 2012, and the reply due October
13
22, 2012, per EDCA Local Rule 230.
14
WHEREAS, The preliminary injunction motion presents complex issues, and additional
15
time is needed for Defendant’s recently retained counsel, to prepare papers in opposition to the
16
preliminary injunction motion.
17
18
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and request that the hearing and
briefing schedule on the preliminary injunction motion (Dkt. No. 6) be modified as follows:
19
Opposition due October 25 2012
20
Reply due November 6, 2012
21
Hearing date November 13, 2012 at 8:30 a.m.
22
23
Dated: October 11, 2012
24
25
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
Adam J. Thurston
Ryan S. Fife
By: /s/ Adam J. Thurston
Adam J. Thurston
26
Attorneys for Defendant
VWR INTERNATIONAL, LLC
27
28
D RINKER B IDDLE &
R EATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PHILADELPHIA
LA01/ 1166186.2
-2-
STIPULATION & ORDER RE HEARING &
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR P.I. MOTION
1
Dated: October 11, 2012
3
LOZEAU DRURY LLP
Richard T. Drury
Christina M. Caro
4
By:
2
5
/s/ Christina M. Caro
(as authorized on 10/11/12)
Christina M. Caro
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7
8
9
10
[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the briefing and hearing schedule on Plaintiffs’ motion
for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 6) is modified as follows:
11
Opposition due October 25 2012
12
Reply due November 6, 2012
13
Hearing date November 13, 2012 at 8:30 a.m.
14
15
16
October 12, 2012
Dated:__________________
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
D RINKER B IDDLE &
R EATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PHILADELPHIA
LA01/ 1166186.2
-3-
STIPULATION & ORDER RE HEARING &
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR P.I. MOTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?