Coalition for Clean Air, Inc., et al v. VWR International, LLC

Filing 9

STIPULATION and ORDER CONTINUING BRIEFING AND HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on October 12, 2012. Motion Hearing currently set for 10/29/2012 is CONTINUED to 11/13/2012 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Munoz, I)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP Adam J. Thurston (SBN 162636) adam.thurston@dbr.com Ryan S. Fife (SBN 235000) ryan.fife@dbr.com 1800 Century Park East, Suite 1400 Los Angeles, California 90067-1517 Telephone: (310) 203-4000 Facsimile: (310) 229-1285 Attorneys for Defendant VWR INTERNATIONAL, LLC 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 COALITION FOR CLEAN AIR, et al., Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. Case No. 1:12-CV-101569-LJO-BAM STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION VWR INTERNATIONAL, LLC, et al., 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 Current Hearing Date: Date: October 29, 2012 Time: 8:30 a.m. Place: Courtroom 4, 7th Floor Judge: Hon. Lawrence O’Neil New Hearing Date: Date: November 13, 2012 Time: 8:30 a.m. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 D RINKER B IDDLE & R EATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PHILADELPHIA LA01/ 1166186.2 STIPULATION & ORDER RE HEARING & BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR P.I. MOTION 1 This Stipulation is made and entered into pursuant to EDCA Local Rules 143, 144, 2 230(f), in the above-captioned action by and between Plaintiffs Coalition for Clean Air, Center 3 For Environmental Health, Association of Irritated Residents, Teamsters Joint Council 7, and 4 Kevin Long (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant VWR International, LLC (“Defendant”) through their 5 respective undersigned counsel: 6 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed the Complaint in this action on September 24, 2012. 7 WHEREAS, Defendant was served with the action on September 26, 2012. 8 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 6) on 9 September 28, 2012, and served Defendant by mail on the same date, per Fed. Rules Civ. Proc. 10 Rules 5, 6. 11 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ preliminary injunction motion noticed a hearing date of October 12 29, 2012, making Defendant’s opposition due on October 15, 2012, and the reply due October 13 22, 2012, per EDCA Local Rule 230. 14 WHEREAS, The preliminary injunction motion presents complex issues, and additional 15 time is needed for Defendant’s recently retained counsel, to prepare papers in opposition to the 16 preliminary injunction motion. 17 18 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and request that the hearing and briefing schedule on the preliminary injunction motion (Dkt. No. 6) be modified as follows: 19 Opposition due October 25 2012 20 Reply due November 6, 2012 21 Hearing date November 13, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. 22 23 Dated: October 11, 2012 24 25 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP Adam J. Thurston Ryan S. Fife By: /s/ Adam J. Thurston Adam J. Thurston 26 Attorneys for Defendant VWR INTERNATIONAL, LLC 27 28 D RINKER B IDDLE & R EATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PHILADELPHIA LA01/ 1166186.2 -2- STIPULATION & ORDER RE HEARING & BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR P.I. MOTION 1 Dated: October 11, 2012 3 LOZEAU DRURY LLP Richard T. Drury Christina M. Caro 4 By: 2 5 /s/ Christina M. Caro (as authorized on 10/11/12) Christina M. Caro Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 7 8 9 10 [PROPOSED] ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the briefing and hearing schedule on Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 6) is modified as follows: 11 Opposition due October 25 2012 12 Reply due November 6, 2012 13 Hearing date November 13, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. 14 15 16 October 12, 2012 Dated:__________________ /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 D RINKER B IDDLE & R EATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PHILADELPHIA LA01/ 1166186.2 -3- STIPULATION & ORDER RE HEARING & BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR P.I. MOTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?