Maldonado v. Shafter-Wasco North Division et al

Filing 17

ORDER Disregarding Plaintiff's 16 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 07/15/2013. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ISRAEL MALDONADO, 12 13 Plaintiff, v. 14 SHAFTER-WASCO NORTH DIV., et al., 15 Case No. 1:12-cv-01586 LJO GBC (PC) ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Document 16) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Israel Maldonado (“Plaintiff”), a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 17 18 forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action on September 29, 2012. On November 6, 2012, the 19 Court issued Findings and Recommendations that the action be dismissed for failure to state a claim. 20 The Court adopted the Findings and Recommendations on November 27, 2012, and the action was 21 closed. 22 23 24 25 On December 11, 2012, Plaintiff filed a one-page letter that was docketed as a Motion for Summary Judgment. In the letter, Plaintiff continues to argue that his sentence is invalid. Plaintiff’s letter is DISREGARDED. This action was closed on November 27, 2012, when Plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff was provided with a copy of a 26 27 28 1 1 section 1983 complaint form, as well as a petition for writ of habeas corpus. He may pursue his 2 claims in another action, if he so chooses. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill July 15, 2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 DEAC_Signature-END: 66h44d 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?