Brown et al v. Fresno Unified School District Educational Facilities Corporation

Filing 3

ORDER GRANTING plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, document 2 , but does not direct service until the Court's screening order has been issued; order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 10/2/2012. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 HORACE CHESTER BROWN, JR., and SHEILA BROWN, CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01597-AWI-SMS 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 10 v. 11 FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, 12 Defendant. (Doc. 2) 13 / 14 By a motion filed September 28, 2012, Plaintiffs Horace Chester Brown, Jr., and Sheila 15 Brown seek to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiffs have submitted a declaration that makes the 16 showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 17 Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis. 18 Notwithstanding this order, the Court does not direct that service be undertaken until the 19 Court screens the complaint in due course and issues its screening order. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 Dated: icido3 October 2, 2012 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?