Brown et al v. Fresno Unified School District Educational Facilities Corporation

Filing 3

ORDER GRANTING plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, document 2 , but does not direct service until the Court's screening order has been issued; order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 10/2/2012. (Rooney, M)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8

HORACE CHESTER BROWN, JR., and
SHEILA BROWN,

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01597-AWI-SMS

9
Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS

10
v.
11
FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,
12
Defendant.

(Doc. 2)

13

/

14
By a motion filed September 28, 2012, Plaintiffs Horace Chester Brown, Jr., and Sheila
15
Brown seek to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiffs have submitted a declaration that makes the
16
showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
17
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
18
Notwithstanding this order, the Court does not direct that service be undertaken until the
19
Court screens the complaint in due course and issues its screening order.
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23

Dated:
icido3

October 2, 2012

/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28
1